BRING BACK THE LOS ANGELES RAMS? | Page 15

Mar 31, 2015 at 1:38 PM

Sanfran_chrisco
Veteran
Posts: 33,137

Originally posted by RedAlice:
RED EIGHTY

is now the OFFICIAL HATED NAME OF ALL ST. LOUIS RAMS FANS. JUST WANT TO NOTE THAT.

fixed

Apr 1, 2015 at 9:35 PM

#212

LVJay
Veteran
Posts: 27,847

Originally posted by RedAlice:

Originally posted by LVJay:
So, we have a Cawk sucker that made an account back in 2013... posing as a 49er fan. Nothing undercover bout that... too obvious, very weak and not the first or last troll to do it.

You have the same poster that many other boards do. Enjoy him.....

He is not a Hawk fan, he is a Rams fan.

lol, which one is it (notice I put "it")... it's a troll

Apr 23, 2015 at 1:00 PM

#213

jrg
Veteran
Posts: 166,549

Apr 23, 2015 at 1:20 PM

#214

cortez96
Veteran
Posts: 703

I'd like them back there.
I have family there. Niner fans unfortunately.

( Wife's side).

Apr 24, 2015 at 1:39 PM

#215

ImRamzFanz
Veteran
Posts: 4

Rams will be staying in STL. NO WAY the NFL screws a city building a new stadium, their second in 20 years, after we supported this team well for a losing decade when the Chargers and Raiders are up for grabs. The owner played the city to get a new stadium and won.

Apr 24, 2015 at 2:53 PM

#216

susweel
Hall of Nepal
Posts: 120,278

Originally posted by jrg:

won't get built, lol

Apr 24, 2015 at 3:02 PM

#217

boast
Hella Fame
Posts: 149,574

Originally posted by ImRamzFanz:
Rams will be staying in STL. NO WAY the NFL screws a city building a new stadium, their second in 20 years, after we supported this team well for a losing decade when the Chargers and Raiders are up for grabs. The owner played the city to get a new stadium and won.

huh? the Rams owner already has the ok to build his own stadium on the land he owns in Inglewood, CA. St Louis hasn't approved anything regarding the building of a new football stadium. a group has a plan, that's all.

Apr 24, 2015 at 3:10 PM

#218

49AllTheTime
Veteran
Posts: 66,661

Originally posted by boast:

Originally posted by ImRamzFanz:
Rams will be staying in STL. NO WAY the NFL screws a city building a new stadium, their second in 20 years, after we supported this team well for a losing decade when the Chargers and Raiders are up for grabs. The owner played the city to get a new stadium and won.

huh? the Rams owner already has the ok to build his own stadium on the land he owns in Inglewood, CA. St Louis hasn't approved anything regarding the building of a new football stadium. a group has a plan, that's all.

i guess that land the Rams owner bought is parking for another LA team ?

Apr 24, 2015 at 4:28 PM

#219

StOnEy333
Hall of Fame
Posts: 99,663

Originally posted by boast:
Originally posted by ImRamzFanz:
Rams will be staying in STL. NO WAY the NFL screws a city building a new stadium, their second in 20 years, after we supported this team well for a losing decade when the Chargers and Raiders are up for grabs. The owner played the city to get a new stadium and won.

huh? the Rams owner already has the ok to build his own stadium on the land he owns in Inglewood, CA. St Louis hasn't approved anything regarding the building of a new football stadium. a group has a plan, that's all.

I heard some legal guys talking about how there is no way for the nfl to stop a team that moves, now a days. They can object all they want as they feel a city that can build its team a new stadium shouldn't lose their team, but technically there's nothing they can do. Plus the Rams contract with their current stadium is up and on a year to year deal now, so they can walk without breaking a binding obligation.

All this means the LA Rams in 2-4 years.

Apr 27, 2015 at 1:59 PM

#220

crake49
Veteran
Posts: 13,201

Originally posted by ImRamzFanz:
Rams will be staying in STL. NO WAY the NFL screws a city building a new stadium, their second in 20 years, after we supported this team well for a losing decade when the Chargers and Raiders are up for grabs. The owner played the city to get a new stadium and won.

I think you're out of luck there on keeping the Rams in St. Louis. On the bright side, the NFL won't let 3 teams move into the same area. The Rams and the Chargers have the inside track, so maybe you folks in St. Louis can get the Raiders.

Just think about it - the St. Louis Raiders! Remember their rallying cry for this year - CAN'T BE STOP!!

Apr 30, 2015 at 1:47 PM

#221

GorefullBore
Veteran
Posts: 4,160

Yeah, screw the Chargers and Raiders sharing a stadium. That just seems weird. The Chargers and Rams joining forces mmakes more sense. Let the Raiders move to San Antonio lol.

May 4, 2015 at 5:18 PM

#222