DeSean not happy

Nov 15, 2011 at 9:11 AM

QBguru
Member
Posts: 529

With Desean getting benched this past Sunday for not showing up to special teams practice do you guys feel he won't be back in Philly?

I think he still is mad about not getting that contract he deserves. I think that the eagles messed up giving Vick all that money and all those other players and neglected to take care of their most explosive playmaker.

Do you guys think he would walk from the eagles?

Where does he end up

Nov 15, 2011 at 9:12 AM

rxrunner
Veteran
Posts: 2,363

here

Nov 15, 2011 at 9:14 AM

9ERFANINAZ
Veteran
Posts: 8,472

Going, Going, Back Back To Cali, Cali

Nov 15, 2011 at 9:15 AM

valrod33
Hall of Small
Posts: 137,970

Sign Him, let Braylon and Ginn Walk

Next year WRs

Crabtree
Jackson
Morgan
Williams

PR Jackson
KR Hunter

Nov 15, 2011 at 9:18 AM

QBguru
Member
Posts: 529

Man Jackson and crabtree would be deadly. Jackson would spell ginn and Edwards both.

Nov 15, 2011 at 9:37 AM

49ersalldaway126
Veteran
Posts: 14,549

I'd rather have Edwards

Ump possession revue era are much more valuable than playmakers

Ya playmakers are lore exciting but possession guys are harder to gameplan against and play a much bigger role

Nov 15, 2011 at 9:38 AM

susweel
Hall of Nepal
Posts: 120,278

Trade him for Chilo and fix the draft f**k up by McClueless.

Nov 15, 2011 at 9:39 AM

valrod33
Hall of Small
Posts: 137,970

Originally posted by 49ersalldaway126:
I'd rather have Edwards

Ump possession revue era are much more valuable than playmakers

Ya playmakers are lore exciting but possession guys are harder to gameplan against and play a much bigger role

We would have 2 possession WRs in Crabtree in Morgan

Nov 15, 2011 at 9:44 AM

pdizo916
Member
Posts: 38,241

Originally posted by 49ersalldaway126:
I'd rather have Edwards

Ump possession revue era are much more valuable than playmakers

Ya playmakers are lore exciting but possession guys are harder to gameplan against and play a much bigger role

I like Edwards BUT YOU MUST BE ON CRACK if u rather have him than Jackson. He is the receiving deep threat we need for our offense(Even though Smith probably cannot throw downfield)

But can u imagine Ginn and Jackson in kickoffs?

Nov 15, 2011 at 9:56 AM

#10

49AllTheTime
Veteran
Posts: 66,649

Originally posted by niners4lyfe:

Originally posted by 49ersalldaway126:
I'd rather have Edwards

Ump possession revue era are much more valuable than playmakers

Ya playmakers are lore exciting but possession guys are harder to gameplan against and play a much bigger role

I like Edwards BUT YOU MUST BE ON CRACK if u rather have him than Jackson. He is the receiving deep threat we need for our offense(Even though Smith probably cannot throw downfield)

But can u imagine Ginn and Jackson in kickoffs?

How has Jackson contributed this year?

Guy is small and is one concussion away from being Javid Best, plus he has the most drops in the past two years

I would only want him in as a PR role

Nov 15, 2011 at 10:12 AM

#11

blizzuntz
Veteran
Posts: 48,115

Usually players play hard to get a big contract and then get lazy.

If Desean gets lazy even before the contract..... Can we say Chris Johnson or Haynesworth?

Nov 15, 2011 at 10:12 AM

#12

pdizo916
Member
Posts: 38,241

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by niners4lyfe:

Originally posted by 49ersalldaway126:
I'd rather have Edwards

Ump possession revue era are much more valuable than playmakers

Ya playmakers are lore exciting but possession guys are harder to gameplan against and play a much bigger role

I like Edwards BUT YOU MUST BE ON CRACK if u rather have him than Jackson. He is the receiving deep threat we need for our offense(Even though Smith probably cannot throw downfield)

But can u imagine Ginn and Jackson in kickoffs?

How has Jackson contributed this year?

Guy is small and is one concussion away from being Javid Best, plus he has the most drops in the past two years

I would only want him in as a PR role

Like Edwards never dropped a pass or two.

Nov 15, 2011 at 10:15 AM

#13

HessianDud
Veteran
Posts: 22,995

he's not having a very good year and his attitude sucks.

He makes some big plays and I wouldn't mind having him at all but I'm just not sure he's what we need.

Nov 15, 2011 at 10:23 AM

#14

LifelongNiner
Veteran
Posts: 22,356

i wanted the guy but he has shown that he has a horrible attitude. A lot of players ought to take notes from a player like Frank Gore on how to go about wanting a new contract and then playing up to (or even beyond, depending on who you ask) that contract.

With what Jackson has pulled, I'd take him AFTER we resign Morgan, Edwards, AND Ginn. With what we have going here, we need players who are dependable and that can be trusted. That doesn't describe Desean Jackson.

Nov 15, 2011 at 10:24 AM

#15

49AllTheTime
Veteran
Posts: 66,649

Originally posted by niners4lyfe:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by niners4lyfe:

Originally posted by 49ersalldaway126:
I'd rather have Edwards

Ump possession revue era are much more valuable than playmakers

Ya playmakers are lore exciting but possession guys are harder to gameplan against and play a much bigger role

I like Edwards BUT YOU MUST BE ON CRACK if u rather have him than Jackson. He is the receiving deep threat we need for our offense(Even though Smith probably cannot throw downfield)

But can u imagine Ginn and Jackson in kickoffs?

How has Jackson contributed this year?

Guy is small and is one concussion away from being Javid Best, plus he has the most drops in the past two years

I would only want him in as a PR role

Like Edwards never dropped a pass or two.

a pass or two compared to double digit drops(Jackson)?