Originally posted by redrathman:
Do you word all of your other posts poorly as well?
Sometimes. Haven't mastered multi-tasking well.
There are 181 users in the forums
Originally posted by redrathman:
Do you word all of your other posts poorly as well?
Originally posted by SybErkRimInAL:
Visual evidence as to why Baalki got rid of Mays!!!!
Originally posted by Jakemall:
Originally posted by susweel:
Originally posted by Jakemall:
Originally posted by Jakemall:ER
Why is this in NT?
Originally posted by Joecool:
This thread no longer belongs here.
Because we are talking about compensation the 49ERS got in return.
I think that is stretching it a bit..but whatever.
Originally posted by SybErkRimInAL:
Visual evidence as to why Baalki got rid of Mays!!!!
Originally posted by BETTERDAYZ9ERS:
Bottom line is if Baalke didn't want Mays here along with Harbaugh (you know how he fells about USC players)and Fangio then they all did a poor job of selling his services to another team. There is film on Mays but he wasn't that bad. I mean we're talking about a team that kept Mark Roman for years.
Originally posted by Joecool:
Originally posted by BETTERDAYZ9ERS:
Bottom line is if Baalke didn't want Mays here along with Harbaugh (you know how he fells about USC players)and Fangio then they all did a poor job of selling his services to another team. There is film on Mays but he wasn't that bad. I mean we're talking about a team that kept Mark Roman for years.
He was that bad. Roman knew the defense and knew where to be. He was just slow. Mays was not quick and didn't know where to be.
Originally posted by crabman82:
Originally posted by Joecool:
Originally posted by BETTERDAYZ9ERS:
Bottom line is if Baalke didn't want Mays here along with Harbaugh (you know how he fells about USC players)and Fangio then they all did a poor job of selling his services to another team. There is film on Mays but he wasn't that bad. I mean we're talking about a team that kept Mark Roman for years.
He was that bad. Roman knew the defense and knew where to be. He was just slow. Mays was not quick and didn't know where to be.
exactly, the guy is our version of aaron curry, excellent physique and speed etc, but doesnt have the brain to process info quick enough on the field
Originally posted by BETTERDAYZ9ERS:
Originally posted by crabman82:
Originally posted by Joecool:
Originally posted by BETTERDAYZ9ERS:
Bottom line is if Baalke didn't want Mays here along with Harbaugh (you know how he fells about USC players)and Fangio then they all did a poor job of selling his services to another team. There is film on Mays but he wasn't that bad. I mean we're talking about a team that kept Mark Roman for years.
He was that bad. Roman knew the defense and knew where to be. He was just slow. Mays was not quick and didn't know where to be.
exactly, the guy is our version of aaron curry, excellent physique and speed etc, but doesnt have the brain to process info quick enough on the field
Well I still felt you could coach him up. Turn him into a LB then. It happens all the time. At least he knew how to dougie
Originally posted by dwy621:
I feel sorry for all those fans I saw at the Fan fest who had Taylor Mays' jerseys...LOL
Originally posted by GoGetit:If he doesn't work on his football skills he will be out of football trying to get a job.
Originally posted by dwy621:
I feel sorry for all those fans I saw at the Fan fest who had Taylor Mays' jerseys...LOL
Don't feel sorry for Mays. he doesn't have to work.
Originally posted by Memphis9er:
If he doesn't work on his football skills he will be out of football trying to get a job.
Originally posted by redrathman:
Originally posted by MadDog49er:
Originally posted by Otter:
Is this the same Clausen that was chosen before Baalke capitulated to Singletary?
Yes, the beat writers have already stated that the argument happened before the Niners were on the clock. Since Clausen was taken at 48, it allowed Singletary more ammunition to beat on the table for Mays at 49.
I worded my previous post poorly.
Do you word all of your other posts poorly as well?