Originally posted by WillistheWall:
Originally posted by dj43:
Originally posted by aman49:
I know many lawyers with tattoos. I am one of them. It's 2011. 1/3 of people have tattoos now. It's not a big deal.
Lawyers do not display their tattoos in public in connection with their job.
If 1/3 of people now have tattoos (I don't accept that number. I don't think it is even half that.), it means that 2/3 DON'T have tats and many of them look at people with tattoos in a negative light. And, and, many of those people are the ones who are putting corporate dollars on the line for season tickets and luxury boxes. Jerry Richardson is one of those who doesn't like tattoos and feels it is in the best interest of his company/franchise, that he prefers players that do not have tats. Why is that wrong?
I respectfully submit you are living in a liberal world that is very different from the majority of America.
So now anybody who has any liberal beliefs is a fan of tats and is very different from the majority of America? Jeez there are a lot of stereotypes in this topic
That wasn't the point of his post.