Originally posted by 49erRider:
Originally posted by Oakland-Niner:
Personally I would replace Stoke with Crabtree on the list at this point in their career.
He's been our best receiver and the numbers he's put up are actually good considering the pathetic offenses he's been given.
If it wasn't for the Internet, people wouldn't be all over Crabtree's case all the time.
Again, I'm not saying he's a bad reciever. That wasn't the questions. This is a relativity question. Most people on this board and a lot of draft gurus had Crabtree going between 3- 7. When he fell this board nearly lost it. Go back and look at the posts (if you can) to see what was being said at the time.
MC looked great his fist year, but a lot of his problems where his own the second year, running bad routes, droping balls, not practicing....