Originally posted by SWAGG-ER:
Originally posted by Dshearn:
Originally posted by Dshearn:
Originally posted by SWAGG-ER:
Originally posted by Dshearn:
Originally posted by TheGoldDiggerrrr:
Originally posted by Jcool:
Originally posted by TheGoldDiggerrrr:
Originally posted by buck:
I am no expert on quarterbacks, but my guess is that Cam Newton will at least be a top 10 pick, and could easily go in the top 5.
The only thing that can stop him at this point is a major blunder of attitude or maybe his father dad will blow it for him.
Good for him. I still think he's got all the problems alex did when we drafted him, minus the big brain. Alex had the size, the arm and the feet and came from a spread system. Only difference is alex wasn't a bad kid and has small hands. Really i think he's to risky for us. But i think we have a much better offensive mind to groom someone, FINALLY! lol Either way, i much rather wait and just take locker if we want a project player. With a top 7 pick and in a weak division we need to take either prince, or miller or peterson, someone who could start sooner and with less risk to get us over the hump and into the playoffs sooner.
Not even close to the size and speed of Newton.
Ok 2 inch's taller and 30 pounds heavier then alex. I never said speed. i said feet. Acutally what was alex's 40 time i doubt cam will match it. I think alex was just a half second faster then rodgers... either way he's a big big project was the point, and if we want a project just take locker who should have the fastest 40 time of all qb's!!
lol
You doubt Cam will match Alex's 40 time? I'll take that bet.
And no way Locker has a faster time than Kaepernick, Taylor, or even Cam. Heck Ponder will probably run faster.
Regardless in the NFL speed isn't as important as escapability. Cam may be the best at that since Big Ben.
Every QB is gonna be a big project. But don't forget, with Harbaugh, no project can be too big. Well, maybe Gabbert. There's no fixin that kid. Unless maybe he decides to become a lefty.
Cam will beat smiths time
He has better feet...
For the record.....rodgers ran a faster 40 then smith
Actually, for the record they ran the exact same time (4.71). Smith had a faster 3 cone though.
Since when did speed matter for a QB?
I'll take Big Ben's lumbering ass any day, thank you.
[ Edited by NickSh49 on Feb 24, 2011 at 12:53 AM ]