Originally posted by TheFunkyChicken:
Originally posted by Whomeam:
Originally posted by TheFunkyChicken:While I agree with you, the people on these teams (for the most part) aren't idiots. If they thought he could help the team even just a little bit, they would have offered something. 31 teams got to take a look at him and in the end the best offer we got was from the Bengals for their 7th in 2 years. If the scouts and coaches thought he would be anything, it wouldn't be because we were trying to hype him up. It would be because they looked at tape of him and that he was great.
Originally posted by Whomeam:
Think about it though. When the bar is set THAT low, you'll take any better offer . That means no better offers were on the table. That shows how much people actually wanted the kid.
I see your point, but I think some of that is due to us broadcasting how badly we wanted to get rid of him.
We should have been telling everyone how it's too bad a player that talented doesn't fit with the new scheme we want to run.
There's a reason everyone was so shocked when we sent that email. And that reason is that it was a SHOCKINGLY STUPID MOVE.
Hell, even Baalke didn't want him in the draft. Dingleberry is the reason we have him. and that right there is my only criticism of Baalke so far. He should have stepped up and said no instead of giving in and having us waste a pick.
I don't know if agree with you.
Sure, we reached when drafted him. But someone would have certainly drafted him by the 4th round if we didn't take him in the second.
So between then and now what happened to cause everyone to give up on him? I don't think it was his play in games last year. He wasn't great, but he did make a few impressive plays on special teams.
What happened is that we made it very clear to everyone that we, the team who sees him every day in practice, think he sucks. I'm saying we could have tried harder to send a different message and there might have been teams that were still interested.
Yep. That mass email was amateur hour.