There are 476 users in the forums

Remember
Not a member? Register Now!

Worst win differential from 2009 to 2010?

Worst win differential from 2009 to 2010?

We picked a good team last year to trade our second round pick in 2009 for their first round pick in 2010. The Pathers win differential from 2008 to 2009 was -4. So they thought they were trading us a late first round pick in 2009 for an early second round pick in 2008, but it didn't turn out that way and we got a great deal. If we were going to do the same in this years draft and trade our second round pick in 2009 for another teams first round pick in 2010 who would you want it to be? Another way of asking the question is who do you think is going to have the worst win differential from 2009 to 2010?
Worst teams in win differential from 2008 to 2009:
Tampa Bay: -6
Tennesee: -5
Carolina: -4
NY Giants: -4
Miami: -4
Washington: -4
AZ & MN, assuming Favre & Warner retire.
  • BigRon
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 14,778
Originally posted by Overkill:
AZ & MN, assuming Favre & Warner retire.

Don't forget the Chargers 13-3 is gonna be awful hard to repeat. even if they go 10-6 that would still be a -3 and it is more likely that they go 9-7 if they lose Merriman
I would go with Arizona if Warner retires. And it would feel twice as good to sweep them again next year because it would help us to win the division AND get a better draft pick. If Warner retires I'm all for trading our second this year for their first in 2011.
  • krizay
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 14,958
i'm going Bengals.
Originally posted by krizay:
i'm going Bengals.
Why the Bengals? I see them having another decent year next year. Maybe a slight drop-off, but I think they'll do OK.
I think the Giants are going to be bad next year. Shanahan is going to have the Redskins playing better, the Cowboys are still tough even though they suck in the playoffs, the Eagles are young and will only get better.
Vikes. Favre will return to old form of throwing picks.
  • krizay
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 14,958
Originally posted by Superbowl09:
Why the Bengals? I see them having another decent year next year. Maybe a slight drop-off, but I think they'll do OK.

I personally didn't think they were that good this year. Just very opportunistic. Won a lot of close games. Plus I don't see them sweeping the division. Plus their schedule next year is AFC east, NFC South with Chargers and Colts.
Im thinking San Diego
I think the Cards, Eagles, Broncos could all see decent dips, but I voted Bengals because I don't think they were all that good and I don't see them being any better this season. Of the others I think the Broncos are also definitely frauds but they play in an easier division...Also, the Steelers, depending on how all the suspension stuff plays out, could end up turning in a pretty awful year.
Philly
If pitt had more W's this year I would choose them. I think they are gonna have a huge collapse.