Originally posted by GolittaCamper:
NO, we don't need a #1 receiver.... for that matter when the Hell did #1 receiver become a freaking position? What the hell makea a guy a #1 is he an X a Y or a Z...
Any way we have an offensive CO that does not seem to throw the ball much and a career back-up at QB with a crazy 3/4 side arm slow pitch arm!
Let's see what this Jones kid can do, let Morgan develop, play Hill more and let Bruce age with grace, and less playing time!
This is a good team with a great opportunity to have a good season and possible make it to the play offs, with out making any changes!
When this Miss Crabtree decides were she will play we can look at our need at wide out. If she decides to play for the Jets and the NFL rewards us with a few picks from the Jets we can address some glaring holes at O-line and QB as well as Safety and OLB (pass rush) If the young lady ends up signing with us hopefully she will grow into a "#1"
I agree. How could anyone honestly say they KNOW what we have at receiver with the exception of Battle and Bruce? With the rest of our receivers, it's up in the air. Morgan and Hill have shown some flashes but we honestly don't know what they are going to be because they have never been put in a situation where they can truly showcase their abilities. We may have two 70-90 catch per year guys in this duo, 40-50, or maybe what we saw in 2008 is all we are getting. We honestly won't know for certain until we give them the opportunity to actually make some plays.
If we are going to trade for a player, trade for a RT, a dominating guard, a sack generating OLB, or if we are ultra lucky, a franchise QB if a Cutler situation were to happen again (doubt it). These are definite positions of need where we know we don't have the right players are those spots (especially on the offensive side of the ball). Any of those positions before we trade for a WR.