I think we should--the dude has the height, arm strength, age, and has been to a pro bowl. What do you guys think?
[ Edited by alpha81 on Sep 4, 2009 at 17:08:34 ]
There are 263 users in the forums
Should we trade for Derek Anderson?
Should we trade for Derek Anderson?
Sep 4, 2009 at 5:07 PM
- alpha81
- Veteran
- Posts: 559
Sep 4, 2009 at 5:08 PM
- Carney16
- Member
- Posts: 426
Nah
Sep 4, 2009 at 5:09 PM
- jones49
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,562
I would. Probably a better option than Hill or Smith.
Sep 4, 2009 at 5:13 PM
- fzrdave
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,168
It all depends on the cost. If the deal was reasonable, then Derek Anderson would be a major upgrade from Shaun Hill.
Sep 4, 2009 at 5:16 PM
- alpha81
- Veteran
- Posts: 559
With all the controversy in Cleveland I believe Derek would be happy with a trade. We are only a good QB away to being a playoff team. I would rather have him than stupid Craptree.
Sep 4, 2009 at 5:17 PM
- dmatt
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,341
Let's see if they will take a future Crabtree for him.
Sep 4, 2009 at 5:17 PM
- HessianDud
- Veteran
- Posts: 22,995
one year wonder
Sep 4, 2009 at 5:17 PM
- PRIMETIME21
- Veteran
- Posts: 16,812
Originally posted by jones49:
I would. Probably a better option than Hill or Smith.
Sep 4, 2009 at 5:19 PM
- susweel
- Hall of Nepal
- Posts: 120,278
Yes. He is better then anybody we got.
Sep 4, 2009 at 5:19 PM
- JohnnyMo49
- Veteran
- Posts: 545
the last thing we need is to trade for a QB, we need some continuity for once
Sep 4, 2009 at 5:20 PM
- alpha81
- Veteran
- Posts: 559
Originally posted by HessianDud:
one year wonder
I think I rather have a one year wonder than a no year wonder
Sep 4, 2009 at 5:22 PM
- TheRickestRick
- Veteran
- Posts: 10,382
Hells No! who would he replace? Davis? We arent a super bowl team yet so one player isn't gonna make a difference for this season, and definitely not the highly overrated Anderson. He had Edwards, Winslow, Cribbs and an O-line that didnt give up 55 sacks two years in a row, and still couldn't decidedly win the job.
Start warming up to the idea of Hill being the place holder until Davis takes over, Smith might have a shot but he is better off on another team.
Start warming up to the idea of Hill being the place holder until Davis takes over, Smith might have a shot but he is better off on another team.
Sep 4, 2009 at 5:22 PM
- alpha81
- Veteran
- Posts: 559
Originally posted by JohnnyMo49:
the last thing we need is to trade for a QB, we need some continuity for once
Continuity? Do you really see a future with Hill?
Sep 4, 2009 at 5:23 PM
- backontop
- Veteran
- Posts: 14,346
where is the HELLZ NO option?
Sep 4, 2009 at 5:24 PM
- alpha81
- Veteran
- Posts: 559
Originally posted by 5280High:
Hells No! who would he replace? Davis? We arent a super bowl team yet so one player isn't gonna make a difference for this season, and definitely not the highly overrated Anderson. He had Edwards, Winslow, Cribbs and an O-line that didnt give up 55 sacks two years in a row, and still couldn't decidedly win the job.
Start warming up to the idea of Hill being the place holder until Davis takes over, Smith might have a shot but he is better off on another team.
Dude be real...do you really see Hill or Davis taking us to the superbowl? Davis has played third stringer bro so dont get too exited with him.
[ Edited by alpha81 on Sep 4, 2009 at 17:24:53 ]