Didn't see this anywhere.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/preview09/columns/story?columnist=dilfer_trent&id=4436281
I don't agree with everything, but I like the way he approaches the analysis. He goes a little extreme by ignoring all statistics, but I understand why. I wish there was less statistical analysis (not none, just less) and more stuff like this.
There are 385 users in the forums
Dilfer's QB Analysis
Sep 2, 2009 at 9:00 PM
- Super9er81
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,309
Sep 2, 2009 at 9:32 PM
- 5xChamp
- Veteran
- Posts: 909
Nice read, I think its pretty accurate
Sep 2, 2009 at 9:40 PM
- Schulzy
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,004
Too much emphasis placed on winning, not enough on stats.
What I said sounds a tad askew, but I mean Big Ben isn't the 5th best QB in football. And no way Hasselbeck is 9th. That's just Dilfer being a friend.
But it wasn't too bad.
What I said sounds a tad askew, but I mean Big Ben isn't the 5th best QB in football. And no way Hasselbeck is 9th. That's just Dilfer being a friend.
But it wasn't too bad.
Sep 3, 2009 at 6:35 AM
- GoreGoreGore
- 10HourChicken
- Posts: 54,342
Originally posted by Schulzy:
Too much emphasis placed on winning, not enough on stats.
What I said sounds a tad askew, but I mean Big Ben isn't the 5th best QB in football. And no way Hasselbeck is 9th. That's just Dilfer being a friend.
But it wasn't too bad.
Umm...he was last year.
Sep 3, 2009 at 1:28 PM
- jdt84_2
- Veteran
- Posts: 25,449
Originally posted by Schulzy:
Too much emphasis placed on winning, not enough on stats.
What I said sounds a tad askew, but I mean Big Ben isn't the 5th best QB in football. And no way Hasselbeck is 9th. That's just Dilfer being a friend.
But it wasn't too bad.
would you have rather had dan marino or terry bradshaw?
Sep 3, 2009 at 1:38 PM
- crzy
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 40,285
Originally posted by jdt84_2:Originally posted by Schulzy:
Too much emphasis placed on winning, not enough on stats.
What I said sounds a tad askew, but I mean Big Ben isn't the 5th best QB in football. And no way Hasselbeck is 9th. That's just Dilfer being a friend.
But it wasn't too bad.
would you have rather had dan marino or terry bradshaw?
Dan Marino every time.
Sep 3, 2009 at 7:04 PM
- tn9er
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,893
Originally posted by TheG0RE49er:Originally posted by Schulzy:
Too much emphasis placed on winning, not enough on stats.
What I said sounds a tad askew, but I mean Big Ben isn't the 5th best QB in football. And no way Hasselbeck is 9th. That's just Dilfer being a friend.
But it wasn't too bad.
Umm...he was last year.
He was even worse the year before last....
Sep 3, 2009 at 7:32 PM
- GoNiners
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,351
Originally posted by tn9er:Originally posted by TheG0RE49er:Originally posted by Schulzy:
Too much emphasis placed on winning, not enough on stats.
What I said sounds a tad askew, but I mean Big Ben isn't the 5th best QB in football. And no way Hasselbeck is 9th. That's just Dilfer being a friend.
But it wasn't too bad.
Umm...he was last year.
He was even worse the year before last....
he has a ring though
Sep 3, 2009 at 7:41 PM
- backontop
- Veteran
- Posts: 14,346
Originally posted by GoNiners:Originally posted by tn9er:Originally posted by TheG0RE49er:Originally posted by Schulzy:
Too much emphasis placed on winning, not enough on stats.
What I said sounds a tad askew, but I mean Big Ben isn't the 5th best QB in football. And no way Hasselbeck is 9th. That's just Dilfer being a friend.
But it wasn't too bad.
Umm...he was last year.
He was even worse the year before last....
he has a ring though
I think that he is talking about Hasselbeck not Big Ben
Sep 3, 2009 at 9:29 PM
- simplyfloyd
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,853
this article was very refreshing. Finally, someone who actually played the position giving his take instead of todd mcshay, or meril hodge who played running back...
Great analysis Dilfer!
Great analysis Dilfer!
Sep 3, 2009 at 10:11 PM
- GoNiners
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,351
Originally posted by backontop:Originally posted by GoNiners:Originally posted by tn9er:Originally posted by TheG0RE49er:Originally posted by Schulzy:
Too much emphasis placed on winning, not enough on stats.
What I said sounds a tad askew, but I mean Big Ben isn't the 5th best QB in football. And no way Hasselbeck is 9th. That's just Dilfer being a friend.
But it wasn't too bad.
Umm...he was last year.
He was even worse the year before last....
he has a ring though
I think that he is talking about Hasselbeck not Big Ben
I was talkin about Dilfer
Sep 4, 2009 at 5:49 PM
- fzrdave
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,168
A pretty good read. I mostly agreed with his comments.