9. Lynn Swann
8. Sterling Sharpe
7. Jerry Rice
6. Kellen Winslow Sr.
5. Fred Biletnikoff
4. Larry Fitzgerald
3. Steve Largent
2. Raymond Berry
1. Chris Carter
There are 289 users in the forums
NFL Network's TOP 10: BEST HANDS
Jul 24, 2009 at 5:56 PM
- PTulini
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,401
10. Marvin Harrison
9. Lynn Swann
8. Sterling Sharpe
7. Jerry Rice
6. Kellen Winslow Sr.
5. Fred Biletnikoff
4. Larry Fitzgerald
3. Steve Largent
2. Raymond Berry
1. Chris Carter
9. Lynn Swann
8. Sterling Sharpe
7. Jerry Rice
6. Kellen Winslow Sr.
5. Fred Biletnikoff
4. Larry Fitzgerald
3. Steve Largent
2. Raymond Berry
1. Chris Carter
Jul 24, 2009 at 5:58 PM
- dman
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,453
Originally posted by PTulini:
10. Marvin Harrison
9. Lynn Swann
8. Sterling Sharpe
7. Jerry Rice
6. Kellen Winslow Sr.
5. Fred Biletnikoff
4. Larry Fitzgerald
3. Steve Largent
2. Raymond Berry
1. Chris Carter
W
T
F
Jul 24, 2009 at 6:09 PM
- DynastyPart2
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,307
Jerry has the record for most consecutive games with a catch. Forget them haters!
Larry Fitzgerald ahead of JERRY "THE GOAT" RICE??? Whatever.
Larry Fitzgerald ahead of JERRY "THE GOAT" RICE??? Whatever.
Jul 24, 2009 at 6:23 PM
- PTulini
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,401
Originally posted by PTulini:
10. Marvin Harrison
9. Lynn Swann
8. Sterling Sharpe
7. Jerry Rice
6. Kellen Winslow Sr.
5. Fred Biletnikoff
4. Larry Fitzgerald
3. Steve Largent
2. Raymond Berry
1. Chris Carter
What really gets me pissed is that Biletnikoff cheated. Granted it wasn't against the rules at the time, but he used stick 'em!
Jul 24, 2009 at 7:20 PM
- geturembedder
- Veteran
- Posts: 10,578
Why is everyone so shocked about the man once named "Snap Crackle Drop"?
Jul 24, 2009 at 7:37 PM
- ramanz16
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,487
Why does the nfl network seem to know so little about the nfl? 
Jul 24, 2009 at 8:22 PM
- Dshearn
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,549
Funny since the consensus was early in rices career he had drop problems and by the 90s not even RICE though he had the best hands on the 49ers let alone the history of the NFL.
Jul 24, 2009 at 8:23 PM
- ads_2006
- Veteran
- Posts: 56,518
probably isnt #1, but #7?
knock they have against him "its cause he played with Joe and Steve, who placed the ball in the perfect place for him to catch"
Also got him with the fumble against the Giants in 1986.
[ Edited by ads_2006 on Jul 25, 2009 at 13:14:59 ]
knock they have against him "its cause he played with Joe and Steve, who placed the ball in the perfect place for him to catch"
Also got him with the fumble against the Giants in 1986.
[ Edited by ads_2006 on Jul 25, 2009 at 13:14:59 ]
Jul 24, 2009 at 10:00 PM
- GEEK
- Veteran
- Posts: 19,195
who the f**k cares?
We all know that Rice is the greatest of all time. This is just to spark some attention to NFLN.
We all know that Rice is the greatest of all time. This is just to spark some attention to NFLN.
Jul 24, 2009 at 10:15 PM
- toeknee
- Veteran
- Posts: 54,571
do they base these off stats? less drops per catch ratio or some s**t like that
Jul 24, 2009 at 11:16 PM
- hondakillerzx
- Veteran
- Posts: 19,106
this is a joke, Jerry went something like 200+ consecutive games with a catch, how many of these other guys got close. Jerry had the dropsies his first year or two, after that he was as sure handed as u can ask a receiver to be
Jul 24, 2009 at 11:40 PM
- krizay
- Veteran
- Posts: 24,732
LMAO at the jokers who think consecutive games with a catch means anything. I thought it was the most useless streak ever mentioned at the time they kept mentioning it.
Not saying I agree with this ranking. (not saying I disagree) But using how many games he had with a catch means nothing.
It's not as if it's 200+ consective targets without a drop.
Jul 25, 2009 at 1:09 AM
- jdt84_2
- Veteran
- Posts: 25,449
Originally posted by krizay:
LMAO at the jokers who think consecutive games with a catch means anything. I thought it was the most useless streak ever mentioned at the time they kept mentioning it.
Not saying I agree with this ranking. (not saying I disagree) But using how many games he had with a catch means nothing.
It's not as if it's 200+ consective targets without a drop.
i was thinking the same thing. he could have made 1 catch and 5 drops during that streak and noone would know.
Jul 25, 2009 at 4:04 AM
- 9erfanAUS
- Veteran
- Posts: 16,281
Originally posted by teeohh:
do they base these off stats? less drops per catch ratio or some s**t like that
I doubt there's any statistics behind the rankings except useless stuff such as "most consecutive games with a catch".
-9fA
Jul 25, 2009 at 4:11 AM
- YungAce
- Veteran
- Posts: 46,915
i dont think he had the BEST hands but c'mon.... 7 ?! i'd say top 4