Originally posted by Memphis9er:Originally posted by bassmanr:Originally posted by bigmike55:
And I don't understand how all you Alex Smith lovers are ignoring the fact that Shaun Hill has actually looked like a winner under dire circumstances, put together a winning record from the end of last season, and the season before that. He had pretty much the same team as Alex had in 2007 and 2008, but unlike Alex, he's actually won more than he's lost.
Exact;y!! If you give him time he can win, Alex has not proven that yet. I have seen him come really close but always when it counts he blows it. If Hill would not have been Farve'd he may have still been starting. With Crabtree, Davis and Gore with a decent line he would be much better than Alex Smith.
You can laugh all you want, but you cant deny that Hill will denied the SAME opportunities that Alex has been given throughout the course of his career. I dont ever remember seeing the offense tweaked to Hill's strengths, did you ? Hell, the guy was forced to execute Hostler's and Martz's offenses, and even led our team this past season despite dreadful CONSERVATIVE playcalling by Raye. Even then, he sustained key drives when called upon (Zona, Seattle, Minn). Yet, he flopped for 3 weeks and was sidelined......no tweak in the playbook, no change in playcalling, nada. Meanwhile, Alex's offense went through several molds......to the point that commentators (eg Steve Young) felt that the team was putting their star players (eg Gore) on the backburner......
Double standard, dont you think ?