OFFICIAL: The Shaun Hill Starship

Originally posted by showtime49:

Originally posted by danimal:

Quote:
Um, because it was a Boeing that went down in 1978. Over 100 dead.

Show this image to 100 random people and how many do you think are going to identify that?

Thats kind of important when someone is going to make an assumption about someone else.

I certainly am not going to ASSUME the poster knew that.

So if you're not sure something is real or not, then you should assume it's false and laugh at it?

Or would it be more prudent to just be sensitive to the possibility that it's the real deal?

Originally posted by showtime49:

Originally posted by danimal:

Quote:
Um, because it was a Boeing that went down in 1978. Over 100 dead.

Show this image to 100 random people and how many do you think are going to identify that?

Thats kind of important when someone is going to make an assumption about someone else.

I certainly am not going to ASSUME the poster knew that.

So if you're not sure something is real or not, then you should assume it's false and laugh at it?

Or would it be more prudent to just be sensitive to the possibility that it's the real deal?

Originally posted by backontop:

Originally posted by showtime49:

Originally posted by danimal:

Quote:
Um, because it was a Boeing that went down in 1978. Over 100 dead.

Show this image to 100 random people and how many do you think are going to identify that?

Thats kind of important when someone is going to make an assumption about someone else.

I certainly am not going to ASSUME the poster knew that.

So if you're not sure something is real or not, then you should assume it's false and laugh at it?

Or would it be more prudent to just be sensitive to the possibility that it's the real deal?

or...you could just stop being so sensitive to begin with. people die every day. Hell I had someone die today. It happens it is part of the life cycle.

Originally posted by danimal:

Originally posted by showtime49:

Originally posted by danimal:

Quote:
Um, because it was a Boeing that went down in 1978. Over 100 dead.

Show this image to 100 random people and how many do you think are going to identify that?

Thats kind of important when someone is going to make an assumption about someone else.

I certainly am not going to ASSUME the poster knew that.

So if you're not sure something is real or not, then you should assume it's false and laugh at it?

Or would it be more prudent to just be sensitive to the possibility that it's the real deal?

the latter of course, just as it would be more prudent to ask someone if they are aware that is a real image before ripping into them

Originally posted by backontop:

Originally posted by showtime49:

Originally posted by danimal:

Quote:
Um, because it was a Boeing that went down in 1978. Over 100 dead.

Show this image to 100 random people and how many do you think are going to identify that?

Thats kind of important when someone is going to make an assumption about someone else.

I certainly am not going to ASSUME the poster knew that.

So if you're not sure something is real or not, then you should assume it's false and laugh at it?

Or would it be more prudent to just be sensitive to the possibility that it's the real deal?

or...you could just stop being so sensitive to begin with. people die every day. Hell I had someone die today. It happens it is part of the life cycle.

Originally posted by Super5:

Originally posted by backontop:

Originally posted by showtime49:

Originally posted by danimal:

Quote:
Um, because it was a Boeing that went down in 1978. Over 100 dead.

Show this image to 100 random people and how many do you think are going to identify that?

Thats kind of important when someone is going to make an assumption about someone else.

I certainly am not going to ASSUME the poster knew that.

So if you're not sure something is real or not, then you should assume it's false and laugh at it?

Or would it be more prudent to just be sensitive to the possibility that it's the real deal?

or...you could just stop being so sensitive to begin with. people die every day. Hell I had someone die today. It happens it is part of the life cycle.

Did you find it funny??


It's not about being so sensitive it's about valuing not only your own life but others as well

The problem with today's society many people don't care about others and too many die everyday

Obviously the poster who put the pic on the thread and the one who laughed don't

pathetic

Originally posted by DaveWilcox:

Originally posted by Super5:

Originally posted by backontop:

Originally posted by showtime49:

Originally posted by danimal:

Quote:
Um, because it was a Boeing that went down in 1978. Over 100 dead.

Show this image to 100 random people and how many do you think are going to identify that?

Thats kind of important when someone is going to make an assumption about someone else.

I certainly am not going to ASSUME the poster knew that.

So if you're not sure something is real or not, then you should assume it's false and laugh at it?

Or would it be more prudent to just be sensitive to the possibility that it's the real deal?

or...you could just stop being so sensitive to begin with. people die every day. Hell I had someone die today. It happens it is part of the life cycle.

Did you find it funny??


It's not about being so sensitive it's about valuing not only your own life but others as well

The problem with today's society many people don't care about others and too many die everyday

Obviously the poster who put the pic on the thread and the one who laughed don't

pathetic

Hey... what's going on here? What happened to all the Shaun Hill is great posts? I guess I must have dropped in on the wrong thread..

Originally posted by B650:

Originally posted by DaveWilcox:

Originally posted by Super5:

Originally posted by backontop:

Originally posted by showtime49:

Originally posted by danimal:

Quote:
Um, because it was a Boeing that went down in 1978. Over 100 dead.

Show this image to 100 random people and how many do you think are going to identify that?

Thats kind of important when someone is going to make an assumption about someone else.

I certainly am not going to ASSUME the poster knew that.

So if you're not sure something is real or not, then you should assume it's false and laugh at it?

Or would it be more prudent to just be sensitive to the possibility that it's the real deal?

or...you could just stop being so sensitive to begin with. people die every day. Hell I had someone die today. It happens it is part of the life cycle.

Did you find it funny??


It's not about being so sensitive it's about valuing not only your own life but others as well

The problem with today's society many people don't care about others and too many die everyday

Obviously the poster who put the pic on the thread and the one who laughed don't

pathetic

Hey... what's going on here? What happened to all the Shaun Hill is great posts? I guess I must have dropped in on the wrong thread..

But, but...Hill is a wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinnnnnnnnnnnner!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

*Echos around the room.

Oh wait, the team is 3-3. Nevermind, he isn't.

That's what happened. Everyone kept saying, "Well, we're winning," or, "Well, he's had one bad game." Now they realize that:

A) We aren't winning. In fact, most likely, after this Sunday we'll be losing.

B) Smith is far more talented.

Hence, everyone jumped ship.

Originally posted by Kolohe:

Originally posted by B650:

Originally posted by DaveWilcox:

Originally posted by Super5:

Originally posted by backontop:

Originally posted by showtime49:

Originally posted by danimal:

Quote:
Um, because it was a Boeing that went down in 1978. Over 100 dead.

Show this image to 100 random people and how many do you think are going to identify that?

Thats kind of important when someone is going to make an assumption about someone else.

I certainly am not going to ASSUME the poster knew that.

So if you're not sure something is real or not, then you should assume it's false and laugh at it?

Or would it be more prudent to just be sensitive to the possibility that it's the real deal?

or...you could just stop being so sensitive to begin with. people die every day. Hell I had someone die today. It happens it is part of the life cycle.

Did you find it funny??


It's not about being so sensitive it's about valuing not only your own life but others as well

The problem with today's society many people don't care about others and too many die everyday

Obviously the poster who put the pic on the thread and the one who laughed don't

pathetic

Hey... what's going on here? What happened to all the Shaun Hill is great posts? I guess I must have dropped in on the wrong thread..

But, but...Hill is a wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinnnnnnnnnnnner!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

*Echos around the room.

Oh wait, the team is 3-3. Nevermind, he isn't.

That's what happened. Everyone kept saying, "Well, we're winning," or, "Well, he's had one bad game." Now they realize that:

A) We aren't winning. In fact, most likely, after this Sunday we'll be losing.

B) Smith is far more talented.

Hence, everyone jumped ship.

You guys better pray Smith doesn't bring out his rookie year in him with all the smack talk you guys are bringing.

Here's to Smith guiding us to the playoffs!!!!


............he better not fugg up.

Originally posted by B650:

Originally posted by Kolohe:

Originally posted by B650:

Originally posted by DaveWilcox:

Originally posted by Super5:

Originally posted by backontop:

Originally posted by showtime49:

Originally posted by danimal:

Quote:
Um, because it was a Boeing that went down in 1978. Over 100 dead.

Show this image to 100 random people and how many do you think are going to identify that?

Thats kind of important when someone is going to make an assumption about someone else.

I certainly am not going to ASSUME the poster knew that.

So if you're not sure something is real or not, then you should assume it's false and laugh at it?

Or would it be more prudent to just be sensitive to the possibility that it's the real deal?

or...you could just stop being so sensitive to begin with. people die every day. Hell I had someone die today. It happens it is part of the life cycle.

Did you find it funny??


It's not about being so sensitive it's about valuing not only your own life but others as well

The problem with today's society many people don't care about others and too many die everyday

Obviously the poster who put the pic on the thread and the one who laughed don't

pathetic

Hey... what's going on here? What happened to all the Shaun Hill is great posts? I guess I must have dropped in on the wrong thread..

But, but...Hill is a wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinnnnnnnnnnnner!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

*Echos around the room.

Oh wait, the team is 3-3. Nevermind, he isn't.

That's what happened. Everyone kept saying, "Well, we're winning," or, "Well, he's had one bad game." Now they realize that:

A) We aren't winning. In fact, most likely, after this Sunday we'll be losing.

B) Smith is far more talented.

Hence, everyone jumped ship.

You guys better pray Smith doesn't bring out his rookie year in him with all the smack talk you guys are bringing.

Here's to Smith guiding us to the playoffs!!!!


............he better not fugg up.

The thing is, even if he does play poorly, it can't possibly be much worse than what Shaun Hill was able to muster up, so what do you have to lose?

I find it really hard to believe that Smith isn't going to be able to match Hill's 150 yards per game, or whatever it was through 5.5 games.

All he has to do is watch the turnovers.

Originally posted by Kolohe:

Originally posted by B650:

Originally posted by Kolohe:

Originally posted by B650:

Originally posted by DaveWilcox:

Originally posted by Super5:

Originally posted by backontop:

Originally posted by showtime49:

Originally posted by danimal:

Quote:
Um, because it was a Boeing that went down in 1978. Over 100 dead.

Show this image to 100 random people and how many do you think are going to identify that?

Thats kind of important when someone is going to make an assumption about someone else.

I certainly am not going to ASSUME the poster knew that.

So if you're not sure something is real or not, then you should assume it's false and laugh at it?

Or would it be more prudent to just be sensitive to the possibility that it's the real deal?

or...you could just stop being so sensitive to begin with. people die every day. Hell I had someone die today. It happens it is part of the life cycle.

Did you find it funny??


It's not about being so sensitive it's about valuing not only your own life but others as well

The problem with today's society many people don't care about others and too many die everyday

Obviously the poster who put the pic on the thread and the one who laughed don't

pathetic

Hey... what's going on here? What happened to all the Shaun Hill is great posts? I guess I must have dropped in on the wrong thread..

But, but...Hill is a wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinnnnnnnnnnnner!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

*Echos around the room.

Oh wait, the team is 3-3. Nevermind, he isn't.

That's what happened. Everyone kept saying, "Well, we're winning," or, "Well, he's had one bad game." Now they realize that:

A) We aren't winning. In fact, most likely, after this Sunday we'll be losing.

B) Smith is far more talented.

Hence, everyone jumped ship.

You guys better pray Smith doesn't bring out his rookie year in him with all the smack talk you guys are bringing.

Here's to Smith guiding us to the playoffs!!!!


............he better not fugg up.

The thing is, even if he does play poorly, it can't possibly be much worse than what Shaun Hill was able to muster up, so what do you have to lose?

I find it really hard to believe that Smith isn't going to be able to match Hill's 150 yards per game, or whatever it was through 5.5 games.

All he has to do is watch the turnovers.

That's exactly what I mean by fugging up, 19-31.

Good luck Smith.

Originally posted by B650:

Originally posted by Kolohe:

Originally posted by B650:

Originally posted by Kolohe:

Originally posted by B650:

Originally posted by DaveWilcox:

Originally posted by Super5:

Originally posted by backontop:

Originally posted by showtime49:

Originally posted by danimal:

Quote:
Um, because it was a Boeing that went down in 1978. Over 100 dead.

Show this image to 100 random people and how many do you think are going to identify that?

Thats kind of important when someone is going to make an assumption about someone else.

I certainly am not going to ASSUME the poster knew that.

So if you're not sure something is real or not, then you should assume it's false and laugh at it?

Or would it be more prudent to just be sensitive to the possibility that it's the real deal?

or...you could just stop being so sensitive to begin with. people die every day. Hell I had someone die today. It happens it is part of the life cycle.

Did you find it funny??


It's not about being so sensitive it's about valuing not only your own life but others as well

The problem with today's society many people don't care about others and too many die everyday

Obviously the poster who put the pic on the thread and the one who laughed don't

pathetic

Hey... what's going on here? What happened to all the Shaun Hill is great posts? I guess I must have dropped in on the wrong thread..

But, but...Hill is a wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinnnnnnnnnnnner!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

*Echos around the room.

Oh wait, the team is 3-3. Nevermind, he isn't.

That's what happened. Everyone kept saying, "Well, we're winning," or, "Well, he's had one bad game." Now they realize that:

A) We aren't winning. In fact, most likely, after this Sunday we'll be losing.

B) Smith is far more talented.

Hence, everyone jumped ship.

You guys better pray Smith doesn't bring out his rookie year in him with all the smack talk you guys are bringing.

Here's to Smith guiding us to the playoffs!!!!


............he better not fugg up.

The thing is, even if he does play poorly, it can't possibly be much worse than what Shaun Hill was able to muster up, so what do you have to lose?

I find it really hard to believe that Smith isn't going to be able to match Hill's 150 yards per game, or whatever it was through 5.5 games.

All he has to do is watch the turnovers.

That's exactly what I mean by fugging up, 19-31.

Good luck Smith.

Yeah. I really think he's matured now though, but we'll see how he handles the Colts. If he has another good game, I'll believe. If not, well, he still has the Titans and Bears at home to make up for it.

By the way, I think he's at 22-32 now.