We traded up! | Page 2 | 49ers Webzone Forum

Apr 28, 2016 at 11:50 PM

#16

StOnEy333
Hall of Fame
Posts: 99,663

Originally posted by 9erReign:
Trent can't resist Myles Jack.

I guess he can. lol

Unless he trades into the 2nd to get him.

Apr 28, 2016 at 11:55 PM

#17

YungAce
Veteran
Posts: 46,915

Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Trent can't resist Myles Jack.

I guess he can. lol

Unless he trades into the 2nd to get him.

I would love him forever

Apr 29, 2016 at 6:43 AM

#18

davidboutte
Veteran
Posts: 923

The trade up for Garnett ruined this draft for me. Everyone that traded down won yesterday IMO

Apr 29, 2016 at 6:44 AM

#19

KajunNiner
Veteran
Posts: 778

Originally posted by davidboutte:
The trade up for Garnett ruined this draft for me. Everyone that traded down won yesterday IMO

Why all we pretty much lost was a 4th round pick to assure we really got a guy we wanted. Its not like we have a shortage of picks

Apr 29, 2016 at 6:50 AM

#20

TexasDuck
Veteran
Posts: 942

Originally posted by davidboutte:
The trade up for Garnett ruined this draft for me. Everyone that traded down won yesterday IMO

It cost them a 4th and a swap of a 6th and 7th

Draft pick value shows the 49ers winning that trade. If Garnett was the guy they wanted, why not go get him?

Apr 29, 2016 at 6:50 AM

#21

NinerSickness
Member
Posts: 8,897

Originally posted by davidboutte:
The trade up for Garnett ruined this draft for me. Everyone that traded down won yesterday IMO

Disagree. This draft isn't extremely deep.

Apr 29, 2016 at 7:17 AM

#22

titan
Veteran
Posts: 7,839

Originally posted by NinerSickness:
Originally posted by davidboutte:
The trade up for Garnett ruined this draft for me. Everyone that traded down won yesterday IMO

Disagree. This draft isn't extremely deep.

It will be if teams that keep trading up are getting players that aren't worth trading up for.

Apr 29, 2016 at 7:22 AM

#23

16to87
Veteran
Posts: 7,695

Originally posted by father49er:
Good pick, but maybe a bit expensive.

Originally posted by NinerG94:
2nd a 4th and a 6th for Garnett? Wtf?

Agree , like the player but not in round one an at the expense of extra picks

[ Edited by 16to87 on Apr 29, 2016 at 7:24 AM ]

Apr 29, 2016 at 7:30 AM

#24

LisaTwelve
Veteran
Posts: 2,142

Originally posted by NinerSickness:
Originally posted by davidboutte:
The trade up for Garnett ruined this draft for me. Everyone that traded down won yesterday IMO

Disagree. This draft isn't extremely deep.

John Schneider disagrees . . .

"This is our seventh draft, and to us it's the most impressive one so far in terms of sheer numbers of players," Schneider said. "There's 100 juniors."
Part of that depth includes good balance throughout the draft and at multiple positions, Schneider said: "We think it's strong all the way through. There doesn't seem to be as many huge drop-offs along the way. There are a couple of positions, but not as bad as it has been in the past."

Apr 29, 2016 at 7:31 AM

#25

Niners99
Veteran
Posts: 43,184

Originally posted by davidboutte:
The trade up for Garnett ruined this draft for me. Everyone that traded down won yesterday IMO

Losing 2 extra mid round picks ruined the draft for you?

Apr 29, 2016 at 7:37 AM

#26

NorthBay49er
Veteran
Posts: 11,632

Great pick

Baalke killin da draft

Apr 29, 2016 at 8:45 AM

#27

LasVegasWally
Veteran
Posts: 24,264

Originally posted by davidboutte:
The trade up for Garnett ruined this draft for me. Everyone that traded down won yesterday IMO

Pretty thin-skinned.

I think it was an excellent move.