Round 1 - Pick 7 Shaq Lawson, OLB, Clemson
Round 2 - Pick 37 Josh Garnett, G, Stanford G
Round 3 - Pick 68 Jalen Mills. CB, LSU
Round 4 - Pick 105 Dak Prescott, QB, Mississippi St QB
Round 4 - Pick 133 Scooby Wright, ILB, Arizona
Round 5 - Pick 142 Dadi Nicolas, OLB, Virginia Tech
Round 5 - Pick 145 Joe Thuney OT/OG, NC State
Round 5 - Pick 174 Kenny Lawler, WR, Cal
Round 6 - Pick 178 Max Tuerk, C, USC
Round 6 - Pick 207 DJ Foster, RB, Arizona ST
Round 6 - Pick 211 Anthony Zettel, DT, Penn St
Round 6 - Pick 213 Taveze Calhoun. CB, Mississippi St
Notes: I was originally going to go with Stanley in Round 1 and OLB/DE Shilique Calhoun in Round 2, which I think is more likely. Noting that if the team is high on a guy like Noah Spence, Carl Nassib, Robert Nkemdiche, or A'Shawn Robinson and they fall to 37, they may scoop one of them up instead of Calhoun. Who would be a slight reach, but a very safe pick at 37. Also, there is some debate about when guys like Prescott and Wright may go. This feels about right to me. If they are gone, there are other reasonable options, like Kevin Hogan or Blake Martinez who should be available at similar spots to what I've projected.
But this feels more fun. Lawson is one of my favorite players in the draft and I think he could end up being very special. Wouldn't be upset at all if we went with one of the top tackles or one of the other defensive studs. Particularly Buckner. But I think this is about my favorite combo of meeting needs, getting players I like and being somewhat realistic that I could work up.
Enjoy.
There are 278 users in the forums
Mock Mock Mock. I Love Mocks. Here comes my mock. Down into the forum. Mock Mock Mock.
- 1 2
Apr 26, 2016 at 12:15 PM
- TexasNiner
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,879
Apr 26, 2016 at 1:23 PM
- theninermaniac
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,411
3 of first 6 picks are LBs. Not a fan of that strategy. Would rather get some offensive playmakers. Like Garnett though.
Apr 26, 2016 at 1:45 PM
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 107,677
Wouldn't hate at all....maybe wait on CB we do have a ton of youth there. go play maker in 3rd, overall nice.
Apr 26, 2016 at 1:47 PM
- SFBuckeye
- Veteran
- Posts: 518
Like the Tuerk pick that should satisfy one of our ACL picks!
Apr 26, 2016 at 1:48 PM
- TexasDuck
- Veteran
- Posts: 942
Lawson at 7 seems too high
Apr 26, 2016 at 2:11 PM
- NCommand
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 123,365
If you're high on RT Trenton Brown, this is a great draft. If not, you have a big need at RT and more depth is needed (unless you're assuming Anthony Davis comes back ).
Apr 26, 2016 at 4:46 PM
- SFBuckeye
- Veteran
- Posts: 518
i
Colin Kelly is going to be our RT!Originally posted by NCommand:If you're high on RT Trenton Brown, this is a great draft. If not, you have a big need at RT and more depth is needed (unless you're assuming Anthony Davis comes back ).
Apr 26, 2016 at 4:54 PM
- NYniner85
- Veteran
- Posts: 107,677
Originally posted by NCommand:If you're high on RT Trenton Brown, this is a great draft. If not, you have a big need at RT and more depth is needed (unless you're assuming Anthony Davis comes back ).
Not gonna solve every problem in this draft...would rather give brown a shot then push him back with a high draft pick ahead of him...you know how I feel
Apr 26, 2016 at 5:03 PM
- Kolohe
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 59,887
Change Dak Prescott to Jeff Driskel and I am sold!!!!
Shaq Lawson a little high there.
Shaq Lawson a little high there.
Apr 26, 2016 at 5:12 PM
- Bobdawg78
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,743
Here's to hoping some how Buckner is there at 7. Then we don't have to worry about trading down, or taking someone with lesser talent.
Apr 26, 2016 at 5:14 PM
- pdizo916
- Member
- Posts: 38,241
Stopped reading at "Shaq."
[ Edited by pdizo916 on Apr 26, 2016 at 5:14 PM ]
Apr 26, 2016 at 6:06 PM
- tohara3
- Veteran
- Posts: 28,604
Nice mock
Apr 26, 2016 at 7:28 PM
- Since07
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,068
Originally posted by NYniner85:Originally posted by NCommand:If you're high on RT Trenton Brown, this is a great draft. If not, you have a big need at RT and more depth is needed (unless you're assuming Anthony Davis comes back ).
Not gonna solve every problem in this draft...would rather give brown a shot then push him back with a high draft pick ahead of him...you know how I feel
Good stuff Id like to see Brown start we can add depth at OT later in the draft.
Apr 26, 2016 at 9:06 PM
- TexasNiner
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,879
Originally posted by NCommand:
If you're high on RT Trenton Brown, this is a great draft. If not, you have a big need at RT and more depth is needed (unless you're assuming Anthony Davis comes back ).
You know, I'm torn on this one. I think the reality is, if one of the two top tackles is there, we probably take one of them and see what Dline/OLB talent falls to 37. I think the team is high on Shilique Calhoun and wouldn't be surprised at all to see us grab him in the second if we go OT in the first and someone we like better hasn't fallen from the first round. But a Stanley mock seems too obvious at this point. So, for the moment, and for the sake of doing a slightly less obvious mock, I'm giving Davis and Brown the benefit of the doubt and assuming that between the two of them, we have an answer for at least this year.
Also, although Thuney projects more as a G long term, he can play some T if needed. So, that is another layer of depth while we figure out if Davis still can/will be a legit player in this league. Or if there is greater concern, he could be swapped out for someone who is more of a true OT prospect.
[ Edited by TexasNiner on Apr 26, 2016 at 9:08 PM ]
Apr 26, 2016 at 9:20 PM
- TexasNiner
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,879
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Change Dak Prescott to Jeff Driskel and I am sold!!!!
Shaq Lawson a little high there.
I don't get that mentality at all. He is rated to go 10-11 at the latest. As high as 5 by some. At any rate, the only chance you have in the world to draft him is to take him in the top 10 basically.
With various scheme, size, or injury question marks on almost all the guys rated 3-10 (assuming the QBs are going 1-2), I don't see how anyone can say taking a guy at 7 is "too high" for someone who is expected to go maybe 10th or 11th at the latest.
Liking someone else better is fine. But Lawson, Bosa, Jack, Ramsey, Buckner, Tunsil, Stanley, and Elliot for me could go in just about any order. Throw in Hargraves and Lynch or any others as top 10 possibilities and it only makes it more so for all of them. I don't think any number in the top 10 is too high or low for any of them.
- 1 2