LISTEN: Final 49ers 7-Round Mock Draft With Steph Sanchez →

There are 313 users in the forums

Final mock draft SF_Warrior

  • fan49
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 6,254
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Not my fav....not sure why people want us to draft a center when we have Kilgore signed and Martin as a young backup. Like jones he should have stayed a year but could develop into something.

Don't like listenbee we already have smith. We need WRs that can block in chips system as well.

This looks like a Baalke draft id be bummed if it went down like this.

Martin hasnt exactly impressed out there and Kilgore was ok but can always be improved upon. Plus both of them can play guard if need be. If we can get a legit center it will make the rest of the line better.

iv actually only read great things about him.... compares To: Alex Mack, Browns: Like Mack, Martin isn't a truly explosive athlete but his functional power, awareness and technique could make him the leader of an offensive line for a decade. Also like Mack, an impressive week at the Senior Bowl could help Martin steadily rise up boards as the draft approaches. ranked 65th in the draft, and second best center in the draft by cbs. he must be terrible
[ Edited by fan49 on Apr 26, 2016 at 3:01 PM ]
  • fan49
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 6,254
Originally posted by NYniner85:
You mean Jones? I wouldn't say he's a stud, upside through the roof but needs time and coaching (pretty raw) could be real good don't hate that pick. Kilgore is the starter and is a perfect fit for chip's offense IMO. not a fan of having 3 20 year old centers when we can use that 3rd for something else just my opinion and since was being 29 at season's end old, especially for a center?

not my favorite mock of yours that's all

a center can play guard too lol
Originally posted by SF_Warrior:
2016 DRAFT:

1.Round: ---> Ronnie Stanley, OT, Notre Dame http://www.nfl.com/draft/2016/profiles/ronnie-stanley?id=2555204

2.Round: ---> Chris Jones, DE/DT, Mississippi State http://www.nfl.com/draft/2016/profiles/chris-jones?id=2555393

3.Round: ---> Nick Martin C, Notre Dame http://www.nfl.com/draft/2016/profiles/nick-martin?id=2555189

4.Round: ---> Kolby Listenbee. WR, TCU http://www.nfl.com/draft/2016/profiles/kolby-listenbee?id=2555350

4.Round (comp. pick): ---> Jaylon Smith, ILB, Notre Dame http://www.nfl.com/draft/2016/profiles/jaylon-smith?id=2555310

5.Round (from San Diego): ---> Yannick Ngakoue,OLB, Maryland http://www.nfl.com/draft/2016/profiles/yannick-ngakoue?id=2555421

5.Round: ---> Kevin Hogan,QB, Stanford http://www.nfl.com/draft/2016/profiles/kevin-hogan?id=2555263

5.Round (comp. pick): ---> Maurice Canady,CB, Virginia http://www.nfl.com/draft/2016/profiles/maurice-canady?id=2555178

6.Round (from Dallas): ---> Jayron Kearse,SS, Clemson http://www.nfl.com/draft/2016/profiles/jayron-kearse?id=2555156

6.Round (from Denver): ---> DeAndre Washington, RB, Texas Tech http://www.nfl.com/draft/2016/profiles/deandre-washington?id=2555464

6.Round (comp. pick): ---> D.J. Foste,WR/RB, Arizona State http://www.nfl.com/draft/2016/profiles/d.j.-foster?id=2555467

6.Round (comp. pick): ---> Jared Norris,ILB, Utah http://www.nfl.com/draft/2016/profiles/jared-norris?id=2555384

I love the draft. I think your second and third round picks will be gone by the time the 9ers pick, but trying to think optimistically. I also think Vernon Adams over kevin hogan, but what do I know.
  • fan49
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 6,254
Originally posted by 9erred:
I love the draft. I think your second and third round picks will be gone by the time the 9ers pick, but trying to think optimistically. I also think Vernon Adams over kevin hogan, but what do I know.

vernon adams did everything the top 2 did. Just look at his stats. just as good. 65% completion ratio, 26 tds to int. not bad at all
[ Edited by fan49 on Apr 26, 2016 at 3:19 PM ]
Originally posted by fan49:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
You mean Jones? I wouldn't say he's a stud, upside through the roof but needs time and coaching (pretty raw) could be real good don't hate that pick. Kilgore is the starter and is a perfect fit for chip's offense IMO. not a fan of having 3 20 year old centers when we can use that 3rd for something else just my opinion and since was being 29 at season's end old, especially for a center?

not my favorite mock of yours that's all

a center can play guard too lol

People think a rookie center is just gonna come in and beat Kilgore? Why not get the best OG in the draft in Garnett and keep our vet at center (which I prefer)? Martin was regarded as the best center when he was drafted but it takes a while to transition from college to the NFL at center IMO. Martin still has a chance to be a good center in this league just needs to get stronger ( he's only 22 which is crazy).
We need to draft Paxton lynch.
Originally posted by fan49:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Not my fav....not sure why people want us to draft a center when we have Kilgore signed and Martin as a young backup. Like jones he should have stayed a year but could develop into something.

Don't like listenbee we already have smith. We need WRs that can block in chips system as well.

This looks like a Baalke draft id be bummed if it went down like this.

Martin hasnt exactly impressed out there and Kilgore was ok but can always be improved upon. Plus both of them can play guard if need be. If we can get a legit center it will make the rest of the line better.

iv actually only read great things about him.... compares To: Alex Mack, Browns: Like Mack, Martin isn't a truly explosive athlete but his functional power, awareness and technique could make him the leader of an offensive line for a decade. Also like Mack, an impressive week at the Senior Bowl could help Martin steadily rise up boards as the draft approaches. ranked 65th in the draft, and second best center in the draft by cbs. he must be terrible

Where did I say he was terrible? If he's Alex Mack why is he regarded as a 3rd round pick?

I can copy and paste some things too

"Looks labored in his movement. Stiffness in hips stymies ability to sink and anchor. Leads with upper body too often and plays with weight out over his feet. Needs to bring his feet up under him. Had issues redirecting with power against pass rushers who gained early advantage. Gets jostled around and has to work overtime to stay engaged against powerful players. Will struggle to reach and secure move blocks. Can improve with recognition of blitzes."

IMO he doesn't sound like a center you want in a ZBS don't think he sucks just better prospects in the 3rd at positions of need, also if center was such a huge problem why not try and grab Kelly?
Originally posted by FutureGM:
We need to draft Paxton lynch.

No no we don't...let that be another team's project
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by FutureGM:
We need to draft Paxton lynch.

No no we don't...let that be another team's project

I don't get it? He can be our future franchise QB. He played in an offense similar to chips and He has the highest upside out of the qbs in my opinion. we don't have to give up a bunch of picks like the Rams and Eagles and we can stil get our guy. We also could trade back into round 1 and even trade up in earlier rounds to build the oline and pass rush. But quarterback is what we need. I believe gabbert can play well but he's not our future. The only way I start a rookie QB is if he plays well in training camp/preseason, so unless Paxton is playing solid sit him a year then give him the keys when gabberts contract is up(compensation pick). Our defense has a plethora of young talent and not to burst your bubble or anything but we aren't winning the Super Bowl next year so I say we prepare for the future and hopfully we are semi contenders along the way
Originally posted by FutureGM:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by FutureGM:
We need to draft Paxton lynch.

No no we don't...let that be another team's project

I don't get it? He can be our future franchise QB. He played in an offense similar to chips and He has the highest upside out of the qbs in my opinion. we don't have to give up a bunch of picks like the Rams and Eagles and we can stil get our guy. We also could trade back into round 1 and even trade up in earlier rounds to build the oline and pass rush. But quarterback is what we need. I believe gabbert can play well but he's not our future. The only way I start a rookie QB is if he plays well in training camp/preseason, so unless Paxton is playing solid sit him a year then give him the keys when gabberts contract is up(compensation pick). Our defense has a plethora of young talent and not to burst your bubble or anything but we aren't winning the Super Bowl next year so I say we prepare for the future and hopfully we are semi contenders along the way

He played in a spread offense not the same as chip's. Don't we already have a QB on this team that has a awkward elongated throwing motion & doesn't know how to read defenses? Lynch is gonna be a 1st round pick and is gonna require years to develop, kid's footwork is a mess and he's far behind a lot of other QBs as far as understanding football from a scheme stand point I have to pass with a early pick. Lynch reminds me of Osweiler and he needed to sit a couple years and learn and he's still not that great IMO.

If he falls in the draft sure there's upside but no way are you taking him in the 1st or giving up picks for him...too much unknown for me.

yuck
Originally posted by valrod33:
yuck

Nice response.


Thanks for all the other opinions guys.
[ Edited by SF_Warrior on Apr 27, 2016 at 6:50 AM ]
Share 49ersWebzone