and did this?
Trade the 15th with the chiefs for their 1st (18th) and 3rd (80), then traded the pick with Dallas for our 18th for their 1st (27) and 2nd (60). Ended up with 1 #1, 2 #2, and 2 #3?
For the following picks plus our own forth round is included...
27) 680
46) 440
60) 300
79) 195
80) 190
126)) 46
maybe even traded a 2nd and 3rd rounder to get another low 1st rounder
30) 620
I know a lot will say depends who is and is not available, but would you be mad? Of course if a team really wants a pick them you may get more than the trade value chart. After all KC gave up more than I thought they would for Alec.
There are 214 users in the forums
What if the niners traded back...
Apr 30, 2015 at 1:49 PM
- WildBill
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,100
Apr 30, 2015 at 1:50 PM
- English
- Moderator
- Posts: 40,211
Two trade backs smacks of Woods. Wouldn't be mad until I knew what we did with the picks but Woods????
Apr 30, 2015 at 1:59 PM
- WildBill
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,100
Originally posted by English:
Two trade backs smacks of Woods. Wouldn't be mad until I knew what we did with the picks but Woods????
I understand what you mean, but I guess it depends who is calling the shots, this front office has been a miss at WR so far, but very good at DB and LB.
Woods is equal to AJ, so long as they don't draft WR-then again, a lot of zoners are wanting DGB and he is a huge Boom or bust and the zone is split in the same way on this guy. He may fall as will a lot of others whether real or smoke screen.
I think if it was Walsh, everyone would rave, but even Walsh was not infalliable.
[ Edited by WildBill on Apr 30, 2015 at 2:00 PM ]