Originally posted by bigwads:1-OG
2-OG
3-34 DE
4-34 DE
5- WR
Our problems are greatly compounded by Baalke's horrible draft classes the past three years.
SMH.
There are 244 users in the forums
Originally posted by bigwads:1-OG
2-OG
3-34 DE
4-34 DE
5- WR
Our problems are greatly compounded by Baalke's horrible draft classes the past three years.
Originally posted by English:
Originally posted by bigwads:
1-OG
2-OG
3-34 DE
4-34 DE
5- WR
Our problems are greatly compounded by Baalke's horrible draft classes the past three years.
SMH.
Originally posted by WRATHman44:
Originally posted by English:
Originally posted by bigwads:
1-OG
2-OG
3-34 DE
4-34 DE
5- WR
Our problems are greatly compounded by Baalke's horrible draft classes the past three years.
SMH.
Seriously, How many picks are missed by the most successful GMs? A lot. How many great picks struggle on deep teams/how many crap players start for terrible teams? I wonder if it makes sense to people that talented rookies struggle to earn playing time ahead of talented veterans. The depth on this roster is beyond compare.
Originally posted by WRATHman44:
Originally posted by English:
Originally posted by bigwads:
1-OG
2-OG
3-34 DE
4-34 DE
5- WR
Our problems are greatly compounded by Baalke's horrible draft classes the past three years.
SMH.
Seriously, How many picks are missed by the most successful GMs? A lot. How many great picks struggle on deep teams/how many crap players start for terrible teams? I wonder if it makes sense to people that talented rookies struggle to earn playing time ahead of talented veterans. The depth on this roster is beyond compare.
Originally posted by LifelongNiner:
Originally posted by WRATHman44:
Originally posted by English:
Originally posted by bigwads:
1-OG
2-OG
3-34 DE
4-34 DE
5- WR
Our problems are greatly compounded by Baalke's horrible draft classes the past three years.
SMH.
Seriously, How many picks are missed by the most successful GMs? A lot. How many great picks struggle on deep teams/how many crap players start for terrible teams? I wonder if it makes sense to people that talented rookies struggle to earn playing time ahead of talented veterans. The depth on this roster is beyond compare.
What's interesting is that the people that want to slam Trent Baalke can name a pick here and there that he missed on, but not a single person can name a GM they would rather have in place of Baalke.
Originally posted by znk916:new coaches
Originally posted by bigwads:
Originally posted by LifelongNiner:
Originally posted by WRATHman44:
Originally posted by English:
Originally posted by bigwads:
1-OG
2-OG
3-34 DE
4-34 DE
5- WR
Our problems are greatly compounded by Baalke's horrible draft classes the past three years.
SMH.
Seriously, How many picks are missed by the most successful GMs? A lot. How many great picks struggle on deep teams/how many crap players start for terrible teams? I wonder if it makes sense to people that talented rookies struggle to earn playing time ahead of talented veterans. The depth on this roster is beyond compare.
What's interesting is that the people that want to slam Trent Baalke can name a pick here and there that he missed on, but not a single person can name a GM they would rather have in place of Baalke.
Let me say it again, OG, OG, 3-4 DE, 3-4 DE. If you are still trying to figure this out go watch the St. Louis game.
There are a number of key draft picks over the past few years that were absolute garbage. We needed people badly at positions and the right players were there to select, but Baalke didn't draft them. We are now reaping the rewards.
This is not a Baalke trashing thread per se, but only an acknowledgement that his last few drafts have indeed sucked. Whether you want to admit it or not, we are built on moves done prior to Baalke's hire.
Boone and Iupati will not be here next year (thank god), and we will be adding new OG's. We have one filled from last year, but he is another injury risk. We may only be drafting one OG and sign another in FA, but either way we will be redoing our OG's.
Baalke pissed away the perfect 3-4 DE in Tuitt last year who is now getting starting reps in Pitt or on Benjamin who may be the offensive rookie of the year. He pissed away the Jenkins pick that should have been used on Fleener.
With those two picks alone we are way ahead of where we are now. Baalke has done some great things, but what he hasn't done well is draft well over the last few years. It's not like anyone is looking to dump him, but merely acknowledge the missed opportunities.
Originally posted by ElephantHaley:
For me 2015 49er Draft needs are
#1 Pass Rusher to go with Aldon & Lynch
#2 Deep Threat WR. (Defenses are squatting our very predictable passing game)
#3 Offensive Line (OG/C/OT)Brandon Thomas & Martin can go a long way to fixing this problem if they produce.
#4 CB (True CB) Perrish Cox will get paid somewhere and Brock got paid and gave up and Ward is a safety
#5 RB with size and speed to Back up Hyde and start if needed because Kendall coming off a knee and Gore is DONE
#6 DT/NT to get taught by the BEST JUSTIN SMITH
Originally posted by MC9BEAT:
Calm down on Baalke. Billw Walsh was a genius. He spent his 1st draft pick on a RB, I believe it was the 1st pick of the 2nd rd. Same as a late 1st rounder. He could not play RB so they tried to make him a safety. Then gave up and he was a kick returner for a couple of years and then released.