Originally posted by jrouter4949:
I see you still don't get it,let me slowly explain what i meant OK. GaTech did not need Hill to run "A ROUTE TREE", Just go routes and some come backs....Is The Light coming on NOW. Clemson ran a Balanced Offense which REQUIRED their Wideouts to run a more COMPLETE ROUTE TREE.... there is no LOGIC involved HERE...Bryant Does there Fit What the Niners NEED Someone that can NOT ONLY take the top off the defense but also Blocks down field,beat press coverage and Run other route as needed....Oh and the remark mabout watching Clemson Games only...you need to watch a lot more college games..you be suprised what you can pick up.....just for s**ts and giggle How Old are you? seriously how old are you ..you sound Kinda of young...I know you youngsters want things yesterday.
I just turned 32 on Sunday and talking to you has been a pleasant belated birthday present.
49ers have a running team. Do you think Crabtree isn't asked to run a full route tree? That's more or less how your logic works.
Hill and Bryant are comparable as players, both skill set wise and physical stature. Just because Clemson ran a balanced offense doesn't mean every receiver ran a full route tree. If you run the ball 50% of the time and then throw it deep on a go route the other 50% of the time you can say their offense is balanced but those receivers aren't exactly running the full route tree.
That's the added benefit Clemson and Bryant had with Sammy Watkins on the same team as him. Clemson was able to utilize the best skillset from Bryant and still have a terrific option for other passes in their offense. A balanced offense run vs pass has nothing to do with the skill sets of their players and whether or not a full WR route tree is being used by each member of the offense. Anyone claiming to watch the games can see Bryant is essentially a one trick pony and will need a lot of work to be considered a well rounded receiver.
I'm curious how old you are because your logic and inability to see sarcasm is mind boggling.