Originally posted by Since07:
Couldn't agree more though I wouldn't be mad if we traded up for Evans
This.
There are 248 users in the forums
Originally posted by Since07:
Couldn't agree more though I wouldn't be mad if we traded up for Evans
Originally posted by Andra:
So would you prefer a Evans to a Cooks and would you take him before a top tier CB like Gilbert
Originally posted by longtime49erfan:Originally posted by Andra:So would you prefer a Evans to a Cooks and would you take him before a top tier CB like Gilbert
I like both. I'd be happy if they trade up for Evans; I'd be happy if they get Cooks instead. I think the first two picks will be CB and WR (not necessarily in that order). This draft is filled with very good WRs and very good CBs.
Originally posted by HALCIONDAZE:No WR until the third round? Good thing you're not making the selections.
Originally posted by DeUh:I�m not a fan of waiting until the 3th to draft a WR but there is still a lot of talent in the middle + later rounds. Lets say for example that Tuitt falls because of his foot injury. Then it could look like this.
1. CB Fuller / Verrett
2. DL Tuitt
2..S Brooks
3. WR Elliington
3. WR Latimer
Having Smith Tank Tuitt and Brooks in the future would be sick.
Personally I would wait till the 3th or 4th to get a DL player cause Tank will share snaps with Justin / Ray and the DE Player we select will probably sit on the bench this year. Though the same could be said about a Crabtree/ Boldin replacement.
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by HALCIONDAZE:
No WR until the third round? Good thing you're not making the selections.
This
Originally posted by HALCIONDAZE:No WR until the third round? Good thing you're not making the selections.
Originally posted by Andra:Ellington = Cooks
Street = Matthews
Bryant = Moncrief
Originally posted by VPofCarnage:Originally posted by Andra:Ellington = Cooks
Street = Matthews
Bryant = Moncrief
None of those guys are even close to as talented as the ones to the right of the "equals" symbol.
Originally posted by Andra:
Originally posted by VPofCarnage:
Originally posted by Andra:
Ellington = Cooks
Street = Matthews
Bryant = Moncrief
None of those guys are even close to as talented as the ones to the right of the "equals" symbol.
What is it that the ones on right do so much better than the one on the left that you would use a 1st or 2nd round pick? Especially when you can get the guys on left in the 3rd or 4th while using your pics from the 1st and 2nd rounds on CB,DL,ILB which will not be as good in in the later rounds.
Originally posted by KID9R:
Originally posted by Andra:
Originally posted by VPofCarnage:
Originally posted by Andra:
Ellington = Cooks
Street = Matthews
Bryant = Moncrief
None of those guys are even close to as talented as the ones to the right of the "equals" symbol.
What is it that the ones on right do so much better than the one on the left that you would use a 1st or 2nd round pick? Especially when you can get the guys on left in the 3rd or 4th while using your pics from the 1st and 2nd rounds on CB,DL,ILB which will not be as good in in the later rounds.
Getting an ILB in the top 100 would be so stupid IMO. WR is a much bigger need than ILB and the CB depth in the draft is as good or better IMO than the WR depth. So with the two biggest needs being CB and WR is not unreasonable to think we'll take a WR with one of our first 3 picks.