Originally posted by RollinWith21n52:
Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:
Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:
Originally posted by kronik:Yeah, I really went back and forth on those two. But I think Mathews would be a bit better due to his precise rout running. Most WR's coming out always have to learn work at that. But Mathews can be plugged in right away.
Alot of talent there. Solid job. Personally not sold on Roby but love his athletic potential. Also like Moncrief a bit more but Matthews is good too. Love the Buchanon, McCullers, Richardson picks
Barring injury, that won't happen. No rookie that we'll draft will be starting over Crabby and Boldin, and it's not likely that they'll get more PT than Patton either which means at best, our rookie WR will be a #4 or #5 WR (depending on how Baldwin does in camp). So (IMO), upside should be considered as opposed to the ability to come plug right in. Now, if you feel Matthews has more upside than Moncrief, than so be it. I personally think both are going to be really good NFL WRs, but Moncrief with his vertical game is the more explosive player and that's something we're missing from our current group of WRs.
I agree with the assessment of a rookie not starting...except if this is a pure slot guy. That guy will be worked into the lineup often, if he proves he can play. Think Cooks, specifically. Or, if I had my way, Abbrrederis.
If Cooks was the pick, they'd definitely give him every opportunity to beat out Patton for a slot WR role and put together packages for him to run (bubble screens, short passes, etc.), but the offense is so complicated, I don't think he'd do much more than that early on. Anyone else (Moncrief, Matthews, Abberderis, etc.) would likely only be given spot duty here and there, similar to what LMJ experienced his rookie year. Barring injury, of course.