There are 191 users in the forums

2014 NFL Combine

Feb 25, 2014 at 10:44 AM
Originally posted by DeUh:
Originally posted by LaMichaelJeff:
i'm officially on the Verrett bandwagon. don't give a crap that he's on the smaller side. dude is an absolute player.

Anyone who dont want him because of his size is just out of his mind ! Dont trust my words ? See for yourself !

Verrett 5-9
Vertical 39"

McGill 6-3
Vertical 39"






that's why i'm hoping for either Joyner, Verrett, or Cooks at 30
Feb 25, 2014 at 10:45 AM
Originally posted by DeUh:
Anyone who dont want him because of his size is just out of his mind ! Dont trust my words ? See for yourself !

Verrett 5-9
Vertical 39"

McGill 6-3
Vertical 39"





I want a football player.
Feb 25, 2014 at 10:46 AM
Originally posted by DeUh:
Anyone who dont want him because of his size is just out of his mind ! Dont trust my words ? See for yourself !

Verrett 5-9
Vertical 39"

McGill 6-3
Vertical 39"

Well the vertical has more to do with weight than height.
Feb 25, 2014 at 10:48 AM
Originally posted by VPofCarnage:
Well the vertical has more to do with weight than height.
???
You know how your vertical is measured, dont you?
Feb 25, 2014 at 10:50 AM
  • pd24
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 8,909
Originally posted by DeUh:
Originally posted by LaMichaelJeff:
i'm officially on the Verrett bandwagon. don't give a crap that he's on the smaller side. dude is an absolute player.

Anyone who dont want him because of his size is just out of his mind ! See for yourself !

Verrett 5-9
Vertical 39"

McGill 6-3
Vertical 39"





What does height have to do with the Vert? It is an explosion drill and these 2 guys are the same. 39" is 39", height is not part of the equation.
Feb 25, 2014 at 10:50 AM
  • DeUh
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 4,006
Originally posted by VPofCarnage:
Originally posted by DeUh:
Anyone who dont want him because of his size is just out of his mind ! Dont trust my words ? See for yourself !

Verrett 5-9
Vertical 39"

McGill 6-3
Vertical 39"

Well the vertical has more to do with weight than height.

What those numbers show is that Verret jumps as high as McGill !
Feb 25, 2014 at 10:50 AM
Originally posted by communist:
???
You know how your vertical is measured, dont you?

Yes. What I'm saying is that being taller doesn't necessarily help your vertical leap. Weighing less typically does.
[ Edited by VPofCarnage on Feb 25, 2014 at 10:51 AM ]
Feb 25, 2014 at 10:50 AM
  • pd24
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 8,909
Originally posted by communist:
Originally posted by VPofCarnage:
Well the vertical has more to do with weight than height.
???
You know how your vertical is measured, dont you?

It has nothing to do with how tall you are.
Feb 25, 2014 at 10:51 AM
Originally posted by DeUh:
Just another day in the office for Verrett. Chewing gum while doing the drills and still dominates

I have him at 30 in my mock draft posted several weeks ago :)
Feb 25, 2014 at 10:55 AM
Rich Eisen ran a 5.98 40

Feb 25, 2014 at 10:57 AM
Originally posted by DeUh:
Originally posted by VPofCarnage:
Originally posted by DeUh:
Anyone who dont want him because of his size is just out of his mind ! Dont trust my words ? See for yourself !

Verrett 5-9
Vertical 39"

McGill 6-3
Vertical 39"

Well the vertical has more to do with weight than height.

What those numbers show is that Verret jumps as high as McGill !

Well, yes and no. He's still starting from 6 inches lower, so his 39 inches is still 6 inches lower than McGill's 39 inches. Not making a judgement on who's better or the better fit, just doing the math.
Feb 25, 2014 at 11:12 AM
  • DeUh
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 4,006
Originally posted by 4evrfan:
Originally posted by DeUh:
Originally posted by VPofCarnage:
Originally posted by DeUh:
Anyone who dont want him because of his size is just out of his mind ! Dont trust my words ? See for yourself !

Verrett 5-9
Vertical 39"

McGill 6-3
Vertical 39"

Well the vertical has more to do with weight than height.

What those numbers show is that Verret jumps as high as McGill !

Well, yes and no. He's still starting from 6 inches lower, so his 39 inches is still 6 inches lower than McGill's 39 inches. Not making a judgement on who's better or the better fit, just doing the math.

Ok now i get the misunderstanding. Bad writing on my part. What I wanted to show iwith that comment s that Verrett with 5-9 is as explosive as McGill with 6-3. And he checks every box with that !

A wise man once told "To play in the NFL you can be short or tall but not small"

Verrett is short.
[ Edited by DeUh on Feb 25, 2014 at 11:14 AM ]
Feb 25, 2014 at 11:13 AM
Originally posted by valrod33:
Rich Eisen ran a 5.98 40

Trade up for him.
Feb 25, 2014 at 11:14 AM
Originally posted by 4evrfan:
Well, yes and no. He's still starting from 6 inches lower, so his 39 inches is still 6 inches lower than McGill's 39 inches. Not making a judgement on who's better or the better fit, just doing the math.

His 10 yard split is also a lot faster than McGill's, meaning he can stick with those quicker slot receivers better which is what the 49ers really need.
Feb 25, 2014 at 11:22 AM
  • DeUh
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 4,006
Originally posted by adrenaline:
Originally posted by valrod33:
Rich Eisen ran a 5.98 40

Trade up for him.

Search
YouTube
Flipboard
Threads
×
Share 49ersWebzone