Originally posted by pwillis52beasty:
Will be interesting to see his 40
4.7.
There are 219 users in the forums
Originally posted by pwillis52beasty:
Will be interesting to see his 40
Originally posted by tatdwolf49:
Last yr it was tha midget T.Austin yall luvd N i hated this yr itz K Benjamin i so dont get it...yall are just droolin over what could be ...i so hope some dumb team draftz him high N piss yall off ....
and where do you want to put the 2nd in, if we retain boldin AND baldwin?Originally posted by dtg_9er:I want the niners to draft at least two WRs high...don't put all your eggs into one basket. If this guy is one of them fine!
Originally posted by communist:
Originally posted by dtg_9er:and where do you want to put the 2nd in, if we retain boldin AND baldwin?
I want the niners to draft at least two WRs high...don't put all your eggs into one basket. If this guy is one of them fine!
boldin, crabtree, baldwin, patton, osgood, wr1, wr2 is one WR too much, imo.
Originally posted by communist:and where do you want to put the 2nd in, if we retain boldin AND baldwin?Originally posted by dtg_9er:I want the niners to draft at least two WRs high...don't put all your eggs into one basket. If this guy is one of them fine!
boldin, crabtree, baldwin, patton, osgood, wr1, wr2 is one WR too much, imo.
but you have to count him in somewhere.Originally posted by tatdwolf49:But osgood aint a real WR he'z a special teamz guy ...so IMO he dont count as fas as a WR u can count on to make a play...
Originally posted by communist:
Originally posted by tatdwolf49:but you have to count him in somewhere.
But osgood aint a real WR he'z a special teamz guy ...so IMO he dont count as fas as a WR u can count on to make a play...
@Ghost: like I said, IF we retain both of them.
Originally posted by sfout:Originally posted by tatdwolf49:Last yr it was tha midget T.Austin yall luvd N i hated this yr itz K Benjamin i so dont get it...yall are just droolin over what could be ...i so hope some dumb team draftz him high N piss yall off ....
People on this board said the same thing about Alshon Jeffery after the Bears took him and he had rough rookie year. Now he's lighting it up.
I'd hold your judgement back because I'm sure 100% of the posters on this board would trade the Jenkins pick for Jeffery....Hell 100% of the people on this board would trade the Jenkins pick for Stephen Hill and he's been mediocre. Not saying people were supporting the Jenkins pick but I think it goes without saying that WRs not picked in the top 10 almost always need a 2nd year to validate their selection.
Most people on this board that were realistic wanted Keenan Allen, the year before that it was Rueben Randle. This year the majority of posters on this board want Allen Robinson from Penn State.
Originally posted by Justinsmithjs15:
I understand why everyone wants a speedster, but can you look at the run game if Benjamin was on the team! Crabs blocks well, Boldin also and then Vernon Davis. You add a 6'5 WR to the mix and that is like another tight end! Him with McDonald and Vernon and Crabs is a defense disaster!!
Originally posted by communist:
Originally posted by dtg_9er:and where do you want to put the 2nd in, if we retain boldin AND baldwin?
I want the niners to draft at least two WRs high...don't put all your eggs into one basket. If this guy is one of them fine!
boldin, crabtree, baldwin, patton, osgood, wr1, wr2 is one WR too much, imo.
Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:
Even if we can't/don't re-sign Boldin (and we should), I still think Baldwin's cap space is more valuable. So next year should look something like this:
Crabby
Boldin
Patton
Osgood (or another special team-type veteran)
Rookie #1 - (ideally, a 1st or 2nd round big-bodied WR to take over for Crabs in 2015)
Rookie #2 - (ideally, a 3rd-5th round slot-type/KR/PR)