Originally posted by MadDog49er:
Originally posted by Amir:
both amp and maddog were arguing their points respectively. both posted their views, opinions and facts without any name calling.
what's the problem??
The problem is that he hops onto the board and claimed I was a liar with the "revisionist" comment. After showing him that he lied in his this "revisionist" comment with my April 1 posting, he did not take responsibility and man-up. Just say, "sorry dude, I was wrong", and move on. Still waiting.
Amp Lee, has a history of this type of behavior, intentionally misrepresenting what I say to attempt to discredit me. The mods are aware of this.
The ridiculousness of this approach is: I make tons of errors. Find the ones that are legitimate and make your case. There is no need to create a false narrative. Play fair. I don't hide my boards, play tricky games, etc. Everything is in plain sight on this board.
And with that explanation, I would rather move onto football talk.
To be fair, I backed up my opinion with evidence. Now, I admit, I did not have the evidence you pointed to as it was buried in a thread I did not look in (I only looked at two threads), but I still pulled evidence to support a fact that at one time, was your opinion. I'm man enough to admit that I did not know your opinion had changed, and my apologies regarding that, sincerely. However, I'm far from a revisionist, liar, or troll. That's just completely dishonest.
My claim has very little to do with where Gabbert or Watt was on your best player rankings, and everything to do with the fact you use Watt's success as a crutch to your 'greatness'. My gripe is that you blasted Baalke and York for every thing they did and have never admitted that you were completely wrong. In fact, now it seems that you were just combating Baalke homers, when in reality you had moved the goal posts of what a 'homer' was by spewing so much hate towards the man and our management. You were up in arms about the McDonald contract, you chastised them for letting TKO go in favor of Bowman, you ripped them for not going after Nnamdi or Carr and instead lucking out on getting the runt of the FA CB litter in Rogers, you didn't like the picks of Aldon, Kap, Culliver, or Miller, and you said we'd be more likely to go 4-12 in 2011 than 8-8 (predicting we'd win 6 games).
And it's not even the fact you were so wrong. It's that you condescended anyone who differed in opinion to you. Heck, every poster on here is wrong about things, but no one gives a damn because they don't chastise others for having a differing opinion. Here's your chance. Man up and admit you were flat out wrong about Baalke and our FO.