There are 208 users in the forums
The Scenario
Apr 21, 2012 at 2:04 PM
- AB81Rules
- Veteran
- Posts: 32,785
No, no way would I make that deal. Giving up a future 1st and our 2nd this year for a RB isn't worth it. Much rather trade up for David DeCastro and plug him at RG.
Apr 21, 2012 at 2:08 PM
- nickbradley
- Member
- Posts: 3,755
Originally posted by Thorhawk:Better than making 2,597 new threads.
I haven't made that many threads
Apr 21, 2012 at 2:20 PM
- Thorhawk
- Veteran
- Posts: 16,594
Originally posted by AB83Rules:
No, no way would I make that deal. Giving up a future 1st and our 2nd this year for a RB isn't worth it. Much rather trade up for David DeCastro and plug him at RG.
this
Apr 21, 2012 at 2:34 PM
- matt49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,456
I love Richardson and would like to have him on the 49ers roster but this wouldn't be a smart move and predicting it tells me your not paying attention. The 49ers may in fact draft a RB if he is the BPA at #30 but they aren't giving up the farm for one now. With Gore/Hunter they are at least confident in 2 RBs we have on the roster. We just signed Jacobs and I think he'll stick, no way we make this move.
Apr 21, 2012 at 2:51 PM
- nickbradley
- Member
- Posts: 3,755
Originally posted by matt49er:I love Richardson and would like to have him on the 49ers roster but this wouldn't be a smart move and predicting it tells me your not paying attention. The 49ers may in fact draft a RB if he is the BPA at #30 but they aren't giving up the farm for one now. With Gore/Hunter they are at least confident in 2 RBs we have on the roster. We just signed Jacobs and I think he'll stick, no way we make this move.
I didn't predict anything.
Apr 21, 2012 at 4:29 PM
- DVDA
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,367
Originally posted by afflecksloverboy:
there is a lot of ill will in this thread. if it continues, this thread will be locked.
I think we should place a moratorium on locking threads.
Apr 21, 2012 at 10:36 PM
- m_brockalexander
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,185
Originally posted by AB83Rules:No, no way would I make that deal. Giving up a future 1st and our 2nd this year for a RB isn't worth it. Much rather trade up for David DeCastro and plug him at RG.
I like that Is a much better idea.
Apr 21, 2012 at 10:53 PM
- Squidp
- Veteran
- Posts: 420
Originally posted by m_brockalexander:I agree. 0% chance any team would trade up that far for a power back.
Originally posted by AB83Rules:
No, no way would I make that deal. Giving up a future 1st and our 2nd this year for a RB isn't worth it. Much rather trade up for David DeCastro and plug him at RG.
I like that Is a much better idea.
Apr 21, 2012 at 11:08 PM
- jreff22
- Veteran
- Posts: 65,482
browns won't draft tann at 4
and that trade is dumb
and that trade is dumb
Apr 22, 2012 at 5:19 AM
- English
- Moderator
- Posts: 40,211
Originally posted by DVDA:Originally posted by afflecksloverboy:there is a lot of ill will in this thread. if it continues, this thread will be locked.
I think we should place a moratorium on locking threads.
Your suggestion has been considered, discussed in depth and
Rejected!
Apr 22, 2012 at 9:24 AM
- dtg_9er
- Veteran
- Posts: 33,204
Originally posted by AB83Rules:
No, no way would I make that deal. Giving up a future 1st and our 2nd this year for a RB isn't worth it. Much rather trade up for David DeCastro and plug him at RG.
Making our OLine a dominant one for years to come? Naw! Much rather have another running back sitting on the bench...