There are 129 users in the forums

Remember
Not a member? Register Now!

Fox Sports Mock Draft

  • JDog
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 1,131
Not on this bandwagon!

Fox Sports Mock Draft
could happen. You will see a lot of national sources attaching a qb to the Niners pick. some will have Mallet others will have Newton. I can't see Vonn Miller going that high though.
Fairly at 11? Something is wrong here.
i dont understand why bowers should be picked by the panthers...they have three young and emerging DEs. i'm sorry but that guy doesnt have any knowledge...
von miller that high???
newton in top10?
fairley at #11?????????

the rest of the mock is very reasonable but the afromentioned picks are big headscratchers imo.
  • Kolohe
  • Hall of Fame
  • Posts: 30,895
Originally posted by communist:
i dont understand why bowers should be picked by the panthers...they have three young and emerging DEs. i'm sorry but that guy doesnt have any knowledge...
von miller that high???
newton in top10?
fairley at #11?????????

the rest of the mock is very reasonable but the afromentioned picks are big headscratchers imo.

I know I said anythings possible when it comes to the draft, but Baalke should be fired ASAP. And someone from the Webzone should be hired to run the draft, cause at least none of us would be that stupid to pass on Fairley for Newton.

Von Miller in the Top 10??? And to Arizona of all places, can I have a show of hands of who'd select Von Miller over Robert Quinn???
Originally posted by communist:
i dont understand why bowers should be picked by the panthers...they have three young and emerging DEs. i'm sorry but that guy doesnt have any knowledge...
von miller that high???
newton in top10?
fairley at #11?????????

the rest of the mock is very reasonable but the afromentioned picks are big headscratchers imo.

Probably BPA. Plus when did having to many pass rushers become a problem? Niners got 4 situational pass rushers and the position still needs to be upgraded. You just trade a guy for more picks to bolster other positions if the situation warrants. Charles Johnson had one good year, and Everette Brown still hasn't produced. You don't pass on Bowers for that if you feel he's that special of a DE prospect. And you sure don't do it for Everette Brown. Plus it breeds competition with that position.
Probably the worst mock I have seen. Putting Fairley at #11 and Newton and Mallett as the top 2 QBs is simply a FAIL.
That's an awful mock. If we pass up Fairley/Prince to take Newton at 7, I don't know what i'd do.
I think I'd cry if we passed up on Fairley or Prince.
Originally posted by TMays_isaBEAST23:
That's an awful mock. If we pass up Fairley/Prince to take Newton at 7, I don't know what i'd do.
Originally posted by lamontb:

Probably BPA. Plus when did having to many pass rushers become a problem? Niners got 4 situational pass rushers and the position still needs to be upgraded. You just trade a guy for more picks to bolster other positions if the situation warrants. Charles Johnson had one good year, and Everette Brown still hasn't produced. You don't pass on Bowers for that if you feel he's that special of a DE prospect. And you sure don't do it for Everette Brown. Plus it breeds competition with that position.
johnson is young, brown is young and everybody forgets about greg hardy in this discussion and that the panthers have a big hole at DT...and dont tell me that fairley is so far behind bowers in terms of bpa. their pass-rush is good enough AND young...if they wanna add another DE, they should grab a vet instead of another rookie.
[ Edited by communist on Jan 12, 2011 at 10:15 AM ]
Originally posted by RedWaltz24:
Fairly at 11? Something is wrong here.
Fairly at 11 is ridiculous....he failed there....Cardinals picking a D player and having Newton and Mallet and Gabbert being there instead is a head scratcher....

But people, Newton could very well be an option for us...especially once the draft gets closer and closer. If he declares of course. Dont discount Cam. Im just saying. Hell, Locker can be the pick at #7. A possible Franchise QB anywhere in the top ten trumps all....and there are 4 possible franchise QBs in this class.
[ Edited by ninerlifer on Jan 12, 2011 at 10:32 AM ]
  • JDog
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 1,131
Here's to just hoping that Lucky #7 is a Lucky pick for us!
Originally posted by ninerlifer:
Fairly at 22 is ridiculous....he failed there....Cardinals picking a D player and having Newton and Mallet and Gabbert being there instead is a head scratcher....

But people, Newton could very well be an option for us...especially once the draft gets closer and closer. If he declares of course. Dont discount Cam. Im just saying. Hell, Locker can be the pick at #7. A possible Franchise QB anywhere in the top ten trumps all....and there are 4 possible franchise QBs in this class.
no, it isnt...they already have a rookie in skelton. they need a solid vet...whisenhunt will be fired if he doesnt create sth special. and i dont that happening with gabbert, newton or mallett. nothing is impossible but i just dont see that.
Search Podcast Draft Forum Commentary News Shop Home