Originally posted by ninerlifer:Originally posted by 23zack80:Originally posted by ninerlifer:Originally posted by 23zack80:Originally posted by spizzy:Originally posted by 23zack80:Originally posted by hondakillerzx:Originally posted by aman49:
I am a Buckeyes season ticket holder, and I'm going to say
1) Both Pryor and Newton will be equal(ly bad) QBs at the NFL level
2) Pryor will have a longer NFL career than Newton, because he can be a stud at WR
newton would be a stud at RB. just wait til mike nolan gets a HC gig and drafts him and changes his position
He could be better than Brandon Jacobs and provide some versatility in gimmicky things like the Wildcat.
He's 6-6. Susan Sarandon has a better chance of being a running back than Terrelle Pryor
If you read my post I responded to a post about Cam Newton. Brandon Jacobs is 6-4 260. Cam Newton could be a running back at 6-5 250.
and no one is viewing him as a RB except for you
Could and should are two different words...
OK, ummm yeah you got me good?
Sorry, but the webzone's ability to jump to conclusions and misread posts has been quite amusing lately.