Patrick Peterson LSU

Originally posted by daragon:

Originally posted by stonecold590:
I would LOVE to get Peterson but he will prob already be gone by the seventh pick. I have heard he is the SAFEST pick in this years draft, kind of like Eric Berry of last year but better.

He's better then Eric Berry? Where did you hear that?

Originally posted by rayn36:

Originally posted by daragon:

Originally posted by stonecold590:
I would LOVE to get Peterson but he will prob already be gone by the seventh pick. I have heard he is the SAFEST pick in this years draft, kind of like Eric Berry of last year but better.

He's better then Eric Berry? Where did you hear that?

He is bigger, faster, and has similar ball skills. Plus he is a special teams ace. You don't need to hear about those things from anyone.

Originally posted by SybErkRimInAL:
Mel Kiper has us taking Peterson in his latest mock. if he's there, we take him, no question. Doubt he'll be there.

Originally posted by valrod33:

Originally posted by SybErkRimInAL:
Mel Kiper has us taking Peterson in his latest mock. if he's there, we take him, no question. Doubt he'll be there.

If Von Miller and Peterson are available at 7, Who do we take?

Yes i know thats highly unlikely but still

Originally posted by Travisty13:
Mayock regarding Patrick Peterson

I tend to value what Mayock has to say.

Originally posted by BrianGO:

Originally posted by Travisty13:
Mayock regarding Patrick Peterson

I tend to value what Mayock has to say.

Saying a corner "could be a safety", is basically saying that the player can't cover.

You don't take players in the top ten with the intention of switching them to a completely new, and less important, position and then cross your fingers.

If Patrick Peterson is not a top ten corner, then you don't take him. Antrel Rolle? Seriously? Who here wants to trade the #7 overall pick for Antrel Rolle?

Originally posted by 9moon:
Id go with Peterson.. that's because i fully believe that Ahmad Brooks can be the OLB that we need.. I really think that he can blossom and become an All Pro..

Originally posted by 49ersRednGold:

Originally posted by 9moon:
Id go with Peterson.. that's because i fully believe that Ahmad Brooks can be the OLB that we need.. I really think that he can blossom and become an All Pro..

But what about the other OLB spot? I believe in Brooks. I don't believe in Haralson.

Originally posted by valrod33:

Originally posted by 49ersRednGold:

Originally posted by 9moon:
Id go with Peterson.. that's because i fully believe that Ahmad Brooks can be the OLB that we need.. I really think that he can blossom and become an All Pro..

But what about the other OLB spot? I believe in Brooks. I don't believe in Haralson.

Travie Mccoy

Originally posted by valrod33:

Originally posted by 49ersRednGold:

Originally posted by 9moon:
Id go with Peterson.. that's because i fully believe that Ahmad Brooks can be the OLB that we need.. I really think that he can blossom and become an All Pro..

But what about the other OLB spot? I believe in Brooks. I don't believe in Haralson.

Travie Mccoy

Originally posted by BrianGO:

Originally posted by Travisty13:
Mayock regarding Patrick Peterson

I tend to value what Mayock has to say.

Saying a corner "could be a safety", is basically saying that the player can't cover.

You don't take players in the top ten with the intention of switching them to a completely new, and less important, position and then cross your fingers.

If Patrick Peterson is not a top ten corner, then you don't take him. Antrel Rolle? Seriously? Who here wants to trade the #7 overall pick for Antrel Rolle?

Originally posted by valrod33:

Originally posted by SybErkRimInAL:
Mel Kiper has us taking Peterson in his latest mock. if he's there, we take him, no question. Doubt he'll be there.

If Von Miller and Peterson are available at 7, Who do we take?

Yes i know thats highly unlikely but still