Originally posted by nickbradley:
Originally posted by WINiner:
Originally posted by KID9R:
I can't Imagine us cutting Norris and replacing him with a RB thats never played FB.
Did you watch any of The Moran Noris SuckFest 2009? He should have been cut once the season ended imo. Dude was not good at all in 09.
Yes -- Norris sucked and can't run. Blount and Dixon can block well...supposedly Blount is a very good blocker.
Norris sucks bad. He's old (will be 32), he is slow, he is expensive (~$1 million), he can't run or catch, so the defense can ignore him. He's losing his blocking skills due to old age and slowness.
RB: Gore, Coffee, Dixon
FB: Blount, Robinson (ST)
PS: Miller or Caulcrick or Blount (FB options)
Cut Norris - if they cut him, NOBODY will pick him up, so they can always re-sign him if they need him. FB options Blount / Dixon / Caulcrick / Miller will all be ~ league minimum, Norris will cost ~$1 million?
Most teams don't even use a FB. They play with 3 WR's or 2 TE's instead. We can play either 3 WR's or 2 TE's, and be way better and more versatile than having Norris at FB.