There are 127 users in the forums

Remember
Not a member? Register Now!

Krizay's post combine mock.

Originally posted by tohara3:
Originally posted by ads_2006:
the line still sucks


This
  • pd24
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 2,075
I like it, but how do you say post combine and come away with Dez who didn't even go?

Instead of Dez, would you trade a pick for Brandon Marshall?
  • krizay
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 14,947
Originally posted by pd24:
I like it, but how do you say post combine and come away with Dez who didn't even go?

Instead of Dez, would you trade a pick for Brandon Marshall?

would I? Hell yea.
  • pd24
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 2,075
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by pd24:
I like it, but how do you say post combine and come away with Dez who didn't even go?

Instead of Dez, would you trade a pick for Brandon Marshall?

would I? Hell yea.

I would be ok with Dea too because I think he is going to be good, but I really like your idea of getting a WR. We need 2 top flight WR's and already have onr in Crabs. Dez is faster, so it would be something different on the other side.
Bryant makes sense. The NFL is a passing league now. If a team is going to win, they must have depth at WR. Bryant adds speed, which is much needed, to the offense.

My only question is; will he be there?
Bryant makes no sense since there's no way he gets past either Denver or Miami. But I guess anything can happen...
After thinking about it for a while I like the pick. I wonder what Crabtree's reaction would be though just out of curiosity, think he would be mad? Bryant looks fast though, too bad he couldn't run in the combine.


Drafting Dez Bryant + no major oline upgrades = more passplays resulting with sacks


Me not like.
This looks like a Detroit Lions draft - more WR, no time for the QB.

Edit krazy - u know I love u man, but we got to do something about that OL. It MUST be addressed, and with more than just Pashos (who wasn't that much better than Snyder).

Either we draft a solid RT or we sign one.

[ Edited by NinerGM on Mar 2, 2010 at 22:26:49 ]
It's not bad. I actually like it. If I was nitpicking, I'd try to get Saffold instead of Veldheer in the 2nd.
Particularly like the first 4 picks and the last 2, but it's risky having Veldheer as the only off-season addition at OT. If we went in this direction, I'd re-sign Pashos then ease Veldheer in over time.
  • krizay
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 14,947
Originally posted by NinerGM:
This looks like a Detroit Lions draft - more WR, no time for the QB.

Edit krazy - u know I love u man, but we got to do something about that OL. It MUST be addressed, and with more than just Pashos (who wasn't that much better than Snyder).

Either we draft a solid RT or we sign one.

I made these picks with the top 4 (Okung, David, Bulaga and Williams) off the board at 13. Which to me Jared Veldheer in the 2nd is no more riskier than Campbell at #17.
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Like Graham at 17 but thats about it. I am not saying Bryant isnt good as he obviously is. I just dont want to take another WR with our first pick when I feel there are other areas we should address first. I am very hopeful that Bryant is already taken and think he will be going to Denver or Miami.

I'm taking your stance only difference is i don't think Bryant will be a good NFL player. So I don't like that pick. But the main problem is this mock doesn't upgrade the o line at all.
Its pretty solid. Bryant and Crabtree would be sweet
Bryant at 13=Lengthy holdout looking for top 10 money.

I dont personally want to go through the Crabtree experiance again next year, granted I like Crabtree at WR but the team has enough money wrapped up at WR. I do like the group of 4 young WR's the team has now and Alex is going to need time to find them. RT is a must have with one of the first 2 picks. I personally wouldnt be against both picks going O-line, something like T Williams and Lupati?