Trade our two 1st's for Ndamukong? - 49erswebzone.com Forum

Jan 5, 2010 at 17:53:22

doc_brown_
Veteran
Posts: 470

Would you trade our two 1st rounders for the #1 overall pick to draft Ndamukong Suh?

We wouldn't need to use our franchise tag on Aubrayo Franklyn and we'd have a stud DT, the kind we've been coveting for years! Also, I think this is a legitimate question because having two first round picks would definitely help the struggling Rams.

Jan 5, 2010 at 17:55:05

kronik
Veteran
Posts: 2,997

I don't think he's big enough to play as a nose tackle in a 3-4.

It'd be nice to have him but not at the cost of going thru next season with the same OL.

Anyways, there is a counter to Suh. His name is Iupati.

Jan 5, 2010 at 17:55:20

PA9erFaithful
Veteran
Posts: 10,869

Hell no.

Jan 5, 2010 at 17:56:57

kstolai
Veteran
Posts: 10,908

Originally posted by PA9erFaithful:
Hell no.

Jan 5, 2010 at 18:09:56

Negrodamus
Veteran
Posts: 12,688

o gawd. no not this again. every few days different member starts crap like this.

good luck.

[ Edited by Negrodamus on Jan 5, 2010 at 18:11:26 ]

Jan 5, 2010 at 18:42:14

SonocoNinerFan
Veteran
Posts: 13,438

Even if we wanted Suh, #13 (1150) and #16/17 (1000 max) would only get us to # 3 or 4 . . . so we'd have to give up even more. And we shouldn't be too keen on arming the sorry a$$ Rams with a bunch of early draft picks. It's not an option.

Jan 5, 2010 at 18:59:53

SanDiego49er
Veteran
Posts: 33,265

Jan 5, 2010 at 19:54:50

FredFlintstone
Veteran
Posts: 20,490

FUUUUUUUUUU**********K NO!

Jan 5, 2010 at 19:59:17

Thorhawk
Veteran
Posts: 15,319

Jan 5, 2010 at 23:27:26

#10

bigmike55
Veteran
Posts: 3,448

Why trade two middle of the first round picks, which could potentially become two starters next season.. for Ndamukong Suh, who is a great player in his own right when we don't even need a DT/NT. We will re-sign franklin and our front 3 are great at stopping the run already.

NOOOOO!!!!

Jan 5, 2010 at 23:30:04

#11

Kolohe
Moderator
Posts: 29,079

Originally posted by kronik:
I don't think he's big enough to play as a nose tackle in a 3-4.

It'd be nice to have him but not at the cost of going thru next season with the same OL.

Anyways, there is a counter to Suh. His name is Iupati.

LOL at the Iupati hype around here.

Jan 5, 2010 at 23:36:08

#12

Mister49
Veteran
Posts: 662

NO! 'nuff said!

Jan 5, 2010 at 23:38:56

#13

GEEK
Veteran
Posts: 16,653

Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by kronik:
I don't think he's big enough to play as a nose tackle in a 3-4.

It'd be nice to have him but not at the cost of going thru next season with the same OL.

Anyways, there is a counter to Suh. His name is Iupati.

LOL at the Iupati hype around here.

Don't you dare.

Jan 5, 2010 at 23:39:10

#14

jojomellon
Veteran
Posts: 1,793

wouldnt fit anywhere in a 3-4.

Jan 5, 2010 at 23:49:56

#15

Ether
Veteran
Posts: 1,385

Originally posted by GEEK:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by kronik:
I don't think he's big enough to play as a nose tackle in a 3-4.

It'd be nice to have him but not at the cost of going thru next season with the same OL.

Anyways, there is a counter to Suh. His name is Iupati.

LOL at the Iupati hype around here.

Don't you dare.

Who has Iupati even looked in the eyes, let alone block against, that is comparable to Ndamukong Suh?

[ Edited by Ether on Jan 5, 2010 at 23:50:14 ]