Originally posted by dman:Originally posted by domesik:Originally posted by dman:
Its not even about position, its about what the player actually does on the field.
I dont think we need to take just any RB but we should take a look at Spiller because he does things on the field that guys on our team can't do.
I think this pretty much sums up the pro Spiller argument.
Thanks, I just get sick of people talking about positions all the time like its fantasy football. If the guy fills a role that we need filled it doesn't matter what position he plays.
Sure it does if you can get another guy just as explosive who will be on the field 60 to 80% more of the time.
As would be the case with Bryant.
Or a guy who could contribute as much in other areas who would be on the field 60-80% more of the time. As would be the case with an Olineman or possibly Earl Thomas.
We can still get a speed back to play 20% of the offensive plays and KR/PR duties later on.