Need to pick one of these guys up off the waiver wire for usage later in the year.
Who would you pick up and why?
There are 338 users in the forums
Better for later this year, Mark Ingram or Jahvid Best?
Nov 16, 2011 at 3:17 PM
- Chief
- Veteran
- Posts: 28,271
Nov 16, 2011 at 3:39 PM
- DaManRathman
- Veteran
- Posts: 14,716
Originally posted by Chief:
Need to pick one of these guys up off the waiver wire for usage later in the year.
Who would you pick up and why?
If you have to pick one up right this moment, it would have to be Ingram due to the fact that we don't even know if Best is going to play again this year.
Best would be the obvious choice were it not for the fear of him actually not being able to play another snap this season.
Nov 16, 2011 at 4:35 PM
- YungAce
- Veteran
- Posts: 46,915
I would rather risk it with best than sign ingram. He's been garbage this season
Nov 16, 2011 at 4:53 PM
- DaManRathman
- Veteran
- Posts: 14,716
Originally posted by YungAce:
I would rather risk it with best than sign ingram. He's been garbage this season
Also depends on how desperate the need is. If chief is doing this for depth or flex options and can roll the dice, Best is fine for a gamble. But if the need is more dire for rb2 must start help, may want to go with the guy who is healthier.
Nov 16, 2011 at 5:13 PM
- Chief
- Veteran
- Posts: 28,271
Originally posted by DaManRathman:
Originally posted by YungAce:
I would rather risk it with best than sign ingram. He's been garbage this season
Also depends on how desperate the need is. If chief is doing this for depth or flex options and can roll the dice, Best is fine for a gamble. But if the need is more dire for rb2 must start help, may want to go with the guy who is healthier.
I have Daniel Thomas, Frank Gore, Jackie Battle and Kendall Hunter... So it is more for depth I guess.
Nov 17, 2011 at 11:01 AM
- Chief
- Veteran
- Posts: 28,271
I think I will go with Ingram... but if Best comes back in two weeks and I don't have him I'm going to feel like a scrub.
Nov 17, 2011 at 11:04 AM
- DaManRathman
- Veteran
- Posts: 14,716
Originally posted by Chief:
I think I will go with Ingram... but if Best comes back in two weeks and I don't have him I'm going to feel like a scrub.
Grab Best then. Like you said, it's more for depth so take a gamble. If he comes back, he's clearly the guy you want.
Nov 17, 2011 at 11:46 AM
- YungAce
- Veteran
- Posts: 46,915
Originally posted by Chief:
Originally posted by DaManRathman:
Originally posted by YungAce:
I would rather risk it with best than sign ingram. He's been garbage this season
Also depends on how desperate the need is. If chief is doing this for depth or flex options and can roll the dice, Best is fine for a gamble. But if the need is more dire for rb2 must start help, may want to go with the guy who is healthier.
I have Daniel Thomas, Frank Gore, Jackie Battle and Kendall Hunter... So it is more for depth I guess.
Honestly, I would rather start those running backs over Ingram anyways..