There are 86 users in the forums

Remember
Not a member? Register Now!

Is this veto-worthy? Terrell Owens/Ryan Torain for Andre Johnson

Is this veto-worthy? Terrell Owens/Ryan Torain for Andre Johnson

  • crzy
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 39,280
It is a keeper league
  • 4ML
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 28,391
In a keeper league - that's a one-sided trade. In regular league - that's questionable but I won't veto it.
Originally posted by 49ersMyLife:
In a keeper league - that's a one-sided trade. In regular league - that's questionable but I won't veto it.

Couldnt have said it better myself. For one season it has to be approved. For a keeper leauge it has to be vetoed.
veto
  • krizay
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 14,924
How can anyone say veto this trade? Keeper or otherwise?


Torrain will likely be the starting RB for Wash next year and the rest of this year. The guy trading AJ I assume is trying to win it this year with this trade.

It's definitely not collusion which is the only reason to veto a trade. Just because you or I wouldn't do the trade doesn't mean it's veto worthy.

Furthermore we don't have all the information to even form a solid opinion on this anyway. A: how many keepers they can keep B: who his other keepers are C: if they lose the round in which players were drafted. Which would eman getting a starting RB in a shanahan system next year for what has to be a last round pick while getting to keep his 1st. Which wouldn't be a bad deal.
  • Chief
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 24,889
Nothing wrong with that trade.
  • crzy
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 39,280
Originally posted by krizay:
How can anyone say veto this trade? Keeper or otherwise?


Torrain will likely be the starting RB for Wash next year and the rest of this year. The guy trading AJ I assume is trying to win it this year with this trade.

It's definitely not collusion which is the only reason to veto a trade. Just because you or I wouldn't do the trade doesn't mean it's veto worthy.

Furthermore we don't have all the information to even form a solid opinion on this anyway. A: how many keepers they can keep B: who his other keepers are C: if they lose the round in which players were drafted. Which would eman getting a starting RB in a shanahan system next year for what has to be a last round pick while getting to keep his 1st. Which wouldn't be a bad deal.

It's 3 keepers, and there are no loss of draft picks. This is jrg's WZ Yahoo.com league.
  • crzy
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 39,280
Look my viewpoint is this, and obviously I'm biased,

I just don't think it's possible to veto this trade when Terrell Owens is outscoring Andre Johnson for this season in nearly all fantasy formats. Not to mention the addition of a viable starting RB when healthy in Torain.

Clearly I am leveraging the success of TO and Torain for this season versus Andre Johnson's future value. That's just the nature of trading in fantasy football which is to "sell high".
  • krizay
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 14,924
Originally posted by crzy:
Look my viewpoint is this, and obviously I'm biased,

I just don't think it's possible to veto this trade when Terrell Owens is outscoring Andre Johnson for this season in nearly all fantasy formats. Not to mention the addition of a viable starting RB when healthy in Torain.

Clearly I am leveraging the success of TO and Torain for this season versus Andre Johnson's future value. That's just the nature of trading in fantasy football which is to "sell high".

so i take it you are the one getting AJ?